Rogue State And NED Funded Fake-Grass Roots Movements : A Guide to the Worlds Only Superpower

			Rogue State: A Guide to the Worlds Only Superpower William Blum著 エディション： ペーパーバック 価格： ￥ 1,736
5つ星のうち 5.0 The most convinced and credited work of the anti-imperialist, Mr.Blum!, 2016/5/19 Amazonで購入(詳細) レビュー対象商品: Rogue State: A Guide to the Worlds Only Superpower (ペーパーバック) This book listed and grabbed almost world wide CIA/NED/USAID covert operations in various continents! Of course, it including Japan and China. Recently, he mentioned the fake grass roots groups/ NED funded agitators in China(Hong Kong, Mainland China, Tibet and Xinjiang). The worth reading article is below: October 30, 2015 (1. Ulson Gunnar - NEO) - The Economist had published an article titled, "And the law won: The rise and fall of China’s civil-rights lawyers says much about the Communist Party’s approach to the rule of law." The long-winded and pretentious title would have been more accurate if instead of "China's civil-rights lawyers," it said "US-backed agitators." Because that is precisely who the Economist is writing about, a deep and extensive network built upon millions upon millions of dollars of funding by the US State Department for so-called "nongovernmental organizations" across China, many headquartered or primarily backed by organizations in Hong Kong (NED support for: China, Hong Kong, Tibet, Xinjiang). This network was in part exposed during Hong Kong's so-called "Umbrella Revolution," which failed spectacularly after the various US-backed NGOs leading it and their sponsors were exposed. However, despite the dishonest means by which the Economist frames their article, the content itself if understood in the proper context is very informative. In fact, the content itself directly contradicts the title. Weiquan, or Rights Protection The Economist first defines "weiquan," or rights protection, and explains that the most popular and successful "civil-rights lawyers" posed as working behind this principle. However, their primary example, Pu Zhiqiang along with several others, admittedly spent most of their time attacking the Chinese government, not defending the rights of anybody. The Economist would explain: The evidence against Mr Pu includes tweets in which he ridicules Chinese propaganda, calls China’s ethnic policies “absurd” and appears to question the legitimacy of party rule. The charges are ironic: Mr Pu made his name defending the free-speech rights of journalists and writers. He can expect to spend several years in jail, a fate already being suffered by other prominent activists such as Xu Zhiyong, a moderate advocate for legal rights, who was sentenced last year to four years in prison for disrupting public order. Gao Zhisheng, a fierce critic of the party who took on politically sensitive clients, has been repeatedly abducted, tortured and imprisoned over the last several years. He was finally released from prison in August but little has been heard of him since. Attacking the Chinese government or "defending" those who did, is a far cry from the principles of "weiquan" which include standing up against and exposing corruption, defending victims of land grabs and other exercises in the abuse of power. One is aimed at agitation, division and the undermining of sociopolitical stability, the other is aimed at strengthening it. And while many agitators may take on cases involving the latter, they do so only to legitimize their primary focus on the former. Throughout the Economist's article, examples of the Chinese government giving in on legitimate grievances is noted as part of the success of many of these agitators who attached themselves to these legitimate causes. Many of these causes were already being fought for long before US-funded and backed agitators showed up, and only to help fuel their other more nefarious activities. The Economist would note: In the end, however, the lawyers fell victim to their own success. The party became suspicious of their networks, and their rapid deployment at scenes of confrontation with officialdom, such as protests by residents enraged at the bulldozing of their houses by government-backed developers. In 2006 Luo Gan, then China’s security chief, urged that “forceful measures” be used against saboteurs of the system who operate “under the guise of weiquan”. That is when the men on the cover of Asia Weekly, already by then under intense official scrutiny, became China’s most wanted. President Xi is now finishing the job of locking them away. China's security chief himself in his statement regarding America's stable of agitators accuses them of hiding behind "weiquan," indicating that "weiquan" or rights protection in and of itself is not what Beijing has taken issue with. Beijing realizes the importance of stemming the abuse of its people's rights by wanton corruption and abuse of power. If left unchecked, regardless of Beijing's philosophical or ideological beliefs, such abuse will inevitably lead to instability, and more so with foreign-funded networks specifically seeking to create such conditions. China Targets Agitators By Separating Legitimate/Illegitimate Opposition In the end, the Economist's article is about China shutting down networks of agitators posing as "right protectors," not because Beijing believes protecting the rights of its people is unimportant, but specifically because of the damage to real rights advocates Washington's networks are causing and the inevitable instability it will lead to. When protesters bring to Beijing a specific grievance and seek a specific solution, even the Economist appears to admit Beijing is willing to consider such cases. However, when opposition brings legitimate grievances, but instead of a specific solution only seeks to undermine Beijing, the book is thrown at them. Still, in the minds of many well-intentioned individuals, they cannot differentiate between legitimate protests and foreign-funded sedition and agitation. The network the Economist mentions is backed, referenced, their organizations and affiliates funded and supported by the US State Department, its National Endowment for Democracy and the immense networks of parallel NGOs and government agencies both in the US and in Europe that serve as their willing accomplices not only in China but all around the world. Beijing's best bet is to continue improving its responses to legitimate grievances and truly seeking to improve the lives of the people living under its rule, while differentiating and exposing the game agitators play. Separating agitators clearly from the many legitimate causes they use to camouflage themselves with is an essential step to channeling social tension from the streets in the form of protests, and into other directions where the actual source of the tensions can be practically dealt with. The Economist admits these "civil-rights lawyers" have been bested, but in doing so, they admit the US' formidable network of global agitators no longer has free reign in China. Ulson Gunnar, a New York-based geopolitical analyst and writer especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”. In conclusion, SEALDs, Sunflower Movement, Umbrella Revolution and VOICE=Viettan are NED funded fake grass roots groups in Asia to conduct NED conspiracies of social destabilisation among targeted nations. Mr. Blum gives us the true understanding of these covert operations scientifically! NED-funded Taiwan Sunflower Movement, Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution, Vietnam VOICE and the student group SEALDs from Japan to establish international fake grass roots movement network for future joint-operations 日本のSEALDsは、全米民主主義基金NEDの人工芝運動である。NEDとは、CIAの代理で国務省の意向で各国の標的国、地域の政治的不安定化を惹起し、その外交目的を達するために、NGOを組織し、資金援助し大衆工作を行う機関である。 Source:http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/TrojanHorse_RS.html 参照：http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/全米民主主義基金 事実関係：カラー革命、アラブの春、台湾ひまわり運動、香港傘革命、ベトナム／フィリピンVOICE反中運動などが、全米民主主義基金NED（National Endowment for Democracy）に、資金援助されその人工芝運動を実施してきたことは大方周知の事実である。 本年4月上旬にフィリピンのマニラで全米民主主義基金NED（National Endowment for Democracy）が支援する東アジアのこれらの人工芝運動の代表達が集い、活動報告を行い、未来の国際的な合作とネットワーク化に合意した。 評価：全米民主主義基金NED（National Endowment for Democracy）の支援するこれらの人工芝運動団体の組織と迎合、協調する組織も、彼らと合作する組織も全体として全米民主主義基金NED（National Endowment for Democracy）の勢力を構成する。 記事リンク：http://www.manila-shimbun.com/category/politics/news222633.html 表向きの主催者団体は、ベトナムに拠点を持ち、全米民主主義基金NED（National Endowment for Democracy）にファンドされて反政府、反中活動を行っているVOICEというNGOである。しかも、VOICEは同じく全米民主主義基金NEDにファンドされて反政府テロに従事しているViettanと関連した組織である。それは、しかもフィリピンに支部を持っており、フィリピンの反中でもお馴染みである。 Viettanは、２０１４年のベトナム反中運動（騒擾）も仕掛けたし、ベトナム、フィリピンに限らず全世界的に活動する米製反政府テロ組織である。 参考リンク：https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ベトナム革新党　(Viettan)  https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014年ベトナム反中デモ http://www.news24.jp/articles/2014/05/17/10251302.html　（フィリピン反中デモもこのベトナム人学生団体による人工芝運動だった。） 記事：　 アジアの民主主義や民主化運動の状況を話し合う若者団体の初会議が、このほど 首都圏マカティ市内のホテルで３日間にわたって開かれた。 会議には日本、フィリピンなど10カ国・地域の代表が参加。アジアの民主主義発展で 協力を確認するとともに、ネットワークを形成することで一致した。 会議には日本から安保法制反対の国会前デモなどで知られるＳＥＡＬＤｓ（自由と民主 主義のための学生緊急行動）の奥田愛基さん(23)と高野千春さん(22)が参加。 台湾からは、２０１４年３月、中国と台湾間のサービス貿易協定の強行採決に反対し、    立法院を占拠した「ひまわり学生運動」の学生リーダー２人が加わった。　　 香港からは、同年９月に民主主義と公平な選挙を求めて香港中心部を占拠した「香港 雨傘運動」の前秘書長ら２人が駆けつけ、東南アジアではフィリピンやベトナム、ミャンマー （旧ビルマ）が参加。自国の状況から身の安全のため参加を公表できない民主活動家も 集った。  会議ではそれぞれの国や地域における民主主義の現状と将来について協議、異なる 状況の中でも情報交換しながら互いの活動の長所を学び協力することで合意した。 初会合は比とベトナムが中心となった非政府組織（ＮＧＯ）ＶＯＩＣＥが主催したため比で    開催。今後は年に１回の継続的な開催や、参加団体の共同声明発表なども予定して いる。  会議後、マニラ新聞の取材に応じた奥田さんと高野さんによると、ＳＥＡＬＤｓの活動報告に 対し、各国代表はラップでのコールやポップカルチャーを取り入れたデモのスタイルを「斬新」 と称賛した。  また参加者から「日本はアジアの中で最も民主主義が進んだ国」という認識を聞かされ 戸惑ったという。  奥田さんは会議に参加した各国の状況は大きく違い、目標とする民主主義の形も違うが 「努力しないとそれをつかめないということを忘れてはならない」と述べ、引き続き安保法制の 運用を監視していく姿勢を示した。（冨田すみれ子） VOICEに関しては、上記の諸事実について以下の記事が参考になる。 Beware of Trinh Hoi and VOICE - A branch of terrorist Viettan Recently, several anti-governmental individuals have established series of illegal groups and organizations in the name of civil society such as Independent Journalists Association of Vietnam, League of Independent Vietnamese Writers, the Network of Vietnamese Bloggers, Association of Bau Bi Tuong Than coordinated by Le Thi Cong Nhan, Vietnamese Women for Human Rights coordinated by Huynh Thuc Vi, Brotherhood for Democracy coordinated by Nguyen Van Dai, Vietnamese Political & Religiuos Prisoners Friendship Association coordinated by Nguyen Bac Truyen, Former Vietnamese Prisoners of Conscience coordinated by Pham Ba Hai,… All these groups and organizations are born to oppose the Party and State of Vietnam. They try to abuse complicated and sensitive matters to distort the Party and State’s policies.   Rising from these groups, VOICE - an organization led by Trinh Hoi have showed many activities that go against common interests of Vietnam. So, who are Trinh Hoi and VOICE? Let find out with us.  From his introduction, we can see Trinh Hoi has a shiny CV (curriculum vitae) with a dream job, lawyer and has worked as an actor which for that he was awarded the Gold Kite  prize of excellent main actor by the Vietnam Cinema Association, and it’s minded that he also was former son-in-law of general Nguyen Cao Ky, Nguyen Cao Ky Duyen’s husband.   Trinh Hoi was born in 1970 in Ho Chi Minh city. At the age of 15, he left Vietnam like other Vietnamese people at this time to earn themselves a better life and came to Australia. In abroad, he has taken part and conducted many activities with anti-Vietnam forces, including Viettan, a known terrorist organization.  In 2008, he cried out he was summoned by Vietnam’s security authorities about his involvement with Hoang Tu Duy - a spokesman of terrorist organization Viettan and was forbidden to enter the country.     Though there are not much information about this man, we still can see his true face by the act of using Nguyen Cao Ky Duyen’s email address, after divorce, to spread articles denoucing the government inside and outside the country and inciting protests and violence. Those articles had been sent to many forums and email addresses that shocked many people about Nguyen Cao Ky Duyen’s aggressive attitude. It took her time and efforts to explain these allegations.  According to anti-Viettan elements abroad, after being forbidden to come back Vietnam, Trinh Hoi has held many activities against the Party and State of Vietnam in the name of Viettan. For years ago, Trinh Hoi was a member of Len duong International Vietnamese Youth in Australia, a franchise of Viettan, which has nurtured some so-called member of Viettan central committee. Even, Trinh Hoi always insists that he is not a member of Viettan, (a common characteristic of members of Viettan to avoid being boycotted by overseas Vietnamese who don’t want to engage with this terrorist organization), but through all his activities we can draw an obvious answer for ourselves.  About VOICE, established in 2007, which Trinh Hoi is a founder and a director for the Philippines’ franchise, which Viettan built up to collect fund from na?ve people and many kinds of Western funds of democracy and human rights. VOICE stands for "Vietnamese Overseas Initiative for Conscience Empowerment", an organization that disguise as a charity one to conduct activities against the State and people of Vietnam. VOICE has launched many training courses to create elements for anti-government campaigns.  Particularly, VOICE branch in Philippines, which led by Trinh Hoi, is claimed working to assist last Vietnamese boatmen with resettlements in Canada, and to support victims in Haiyan storm. But, the truth is he and his organization are trying to collect money for their activities against Vietnam.  It is said that with broad range of alleged charity activities, Trinh Hoi and VOICE have used their names just to raise fund for Viettan. For example, to operations of training elements for civil society movements, each year, VOICE has received a proper amount of money from National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and Human Rights Watch. But with all these budget, VOICE just can find enough individuals for their cources, so they have to use same trainees over and over.  So, while seeing Viettan as a terrorist organization against the State and people of Vietnam, through their complicity, it’s time for us to exclude VOICE from civil society organizations and name them as a terrorist branch, and they must be condemned!./. Resource:http://humannationalityvn.blogspot.jp/2015/12/beware-of-trinh-hoi-and-voice-branch-of.html 結論：このように、マニラ会合は、本質において全米民主主義基金の主催であり、その支援する台湾ひまわり運動、香港傘革命、ベトナム／フィリピンのVOICE／Viettan、そして我が国日本のNED人工芝運動SEALDsの会合であり、これは東アジア圏における全米民主主義基金の主要な人工芝運動の勢力の結集と国際規模での組織網の再構成であり、未来のジョイントアクションを準備するものである。