NED-Asian Colour Revolutionary Network, NOYDA
Network of Young Democratic Asians?
亞洲青年民主網路;亞洲青年民主連線;亞洲青年民主陣線
Export of 'Democracy' is Anti-Democracy
Note: Some parts of this analysis were written in different languages for different regions' readers particularly due to responsibility of social practice in their own regions. And this analysis is kept updated and transformable anytime. However, its main focus is not western countries but it especially focuses Asia. Exposing their networks is an effective way of preventing imperialist conspiracies.
Recommended Author on this global political issue 'Stealth Imperialism' (a.k.a. Colour Revolution; Regime Change for imperialism) is Mr.William Blum.
URL: http://williamblum.org/
Don't forget that the most democratic intelligentsias are also located in USA. This is not anti-US but it is just anti-imperialism. Recovering true democratic values of USA is part of international struggles. We should not be racists.
Chalmers Johnson and Noam Chomsky are also recommended authors on the issue 'neo-liberalism'.
The most recommended video on this topic 'Colour Revolution' is below:
URL: John Pilger's The War on Democracy (UK, 2007)
What is 'Colour Revolution'? 顏色革命是什麼？
The perfect definition of it is professionally done by Russians. It is a kind of nonmilitary method created during the Cold War era but it serves for traditional military causes without real fires among nuclear weapon-owned countries. This tactic is an alternative military tactic that complete regime change via internal agents within the targeted country or region. There are at least three phases for this regime change.
The 1st. phase is to evolve internal regime change by NGOs, oppositions, popular front and agents within the nation or region. See Soviet Union in 1987, there were more than 3 millions of anti-Soviet NGOs that funded by the West. It formed anti-communist 'popular front.'
The 2nd. phase is to instigate sabotages, strikes and military rebellions. Infiltrating workers' unions done by Solidarity Centre and US embassy. See March 22, 1991 Mine Strikes in Donbass. Military Coup is done by US embassy with oppositions in military. See Chile's 1973 Military Coup.
The 3rd. phase is direct military invasion by US forces. See Panama Invasion of 1989 and Iraq War in 2011. These regime changes were mixed with internal colour revolution methods. After failed attempts of colour revolution, US imperialist State Department decided to let the president's military forces to invade these nations. Thus, colour revolution is not a pure peaceful tactic. It is part of military invasion in the entire imperialist context.
Russian military officers now tied the term “Color Revolution” to the crisis in Ukraine and to what they saw as a new US and European approach to warfare that focuses on creating destabilizing revolutions in other states as a means of serving their security interests at low cost and with minimal casualties.
Source from https://www.csis.org/analysis/russia-and-“color-revolution”
“Attempts to impose homemade recipes for internal changes on other nations, without taking into account their own traditions and national characteristics, to engage in the ‘export of democracy,’ have a destructive impact on international relations and result in an increase of the number of hot spots on the world map.”
RIA Novosti
May 23, 2014 ‘Color Revolutions’ Cause Apparent Damage to International Stability – Lavrov
Source: http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2014/05/26/color-revolutions-upset-global-stability-russian-foreign-minister/
In sum, so called 'colour revolution' (a.k.a. He-ping Yan-bian, 和平演變, peaceful internal transformation which named by ex-US ambassador to Soviet in 1947) is US and West imperialist attempt to impose homemade recipes for internal changes on other nations, and creating destabilizing fake uprisings as a means of serving their security and economic interests at low costs, minimal risks of direct conducts of dirty wars and with minimal casualties. China is the largest target for its Asia strategy.
所謂和平演變失敗後的最後階段是軍事行動。如1989年美軍入侵巴拿馬的例子。顏色革命是種非軍事的軍事手段！破壞當地治安及經濟的政治手段！新的隱形軍事活動。它並非純粹和平合法的！攪局必定是其本質。
美帝所發動的更替外國政權的秘密或公開作戰，和平演變，顏色革命都是同義詞。美帝同時進行秘密顛覆作戰與公開攻打對方的作戰。看看智利在1973年政變以及巴拿馬1989年美軍侵略。此兩件經典事件都最具其典型性。其實，有無資本主義，是否左右政權其實都無絕對關係。美帝都為其跨國利益堆左右外國政權發動了顛覆行動。
NOYDA=NED Colour Revolutionary Network of Young Asians
NED-funded Taiwan Sunflower Movement, Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution, Việt Tân VOICE, SFT and the student group SEALDs (ReDEMOS, Public 4 Future) from Japan reached the agreement to establish international fake-grass-roots-movement network for future joint-operations at Manila gathering in April 2016! The NED network called NOYDA.
在NED的「2012 Strategy Document」中，NED的重要目標之一，就是建立跨境激進分子網絡，當中年輕人便是計劃的主要構成部分。'' See more: https://hkgpao.com/articles/83167
Hong Kong's NED fund was done via Hong Kong-based NDI
NED-NDI-Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe-Anti-China Members of Legistlative Counsel 立法會非建制議員-League of Social Democrats 社民連-Project Civil Referendum 全民投票實踐計劃 Network exposed！Grab the Network of Which Instigating Conflicts!
The International Republican Institute (IRI) is one of the NED’s four core grantees and represents the Republican Party in the NED. It is a sister body of the National Democratic Institute (NDI), which represents the Democratic Party.
-Kevin Law
Source:http://nedprogramsinhk.blogspot.hk/2016/08/international-republican-institute.html
Note: If the inserted video has some technical error to view, please visit the video page.
URL:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HanLgkia9LM
Hong Kong Colour Revolution, 'Umbrella Movement' agitators originally tried to occupy government buildings. However, this detail was not well broad casted. There is a similarity between Sun Flower Movement and Hong Kong one. And it has evolved a form of colour revolution into more violent one. Colour Revolution is now not even a pure peaceful opposition.
Resource: http://www.moonofalabama.org/2014/09/the-ned-hong-kong-riots.html
HKPOP's News: https://hk.news.yahoo.com/港大民研調查-林鄭月娥評分微跌-064900035.html
NDI圖在港搞「顏色革命」 大灑金錢操控反對派
Visit Kavin Law's Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor: http://www.hkhrm.org.hk/english/more/index.html
一國兩制是維持殖民地現狀五十年的意思。舊殖民特權階級都保留下來了。彭定康是其代表人物。舊殖民階級（除了土豪以外，曾統治香港的英國，加拿大，澳洲等白人殖民特權階級）如今變為反中亂港勢力了。一國兩制實踐上是對英國殖民主義以及葡萄牙殖民主義的妥協。反中亂港是美帝醞釀以及進行和平演變，顏色革命的現象。瀕臨崩潰時的末期蘇聯有極為相同之處。反共並非民主！資本主義並不等於民主主義！被洗腦的群眾誤以為自己自覺地選擇政治選項的時候，其實已被帝國主義植入思維的模式所操縱的。換言之，按照帝國主義及其媒體所希望的思路做判斷事情。這正是顏色革命參與者的共同心理狀態。打著民主自由維權的幌子進行擾亂，投機份子，索羅斯之流藉機放空當地股票大獲利！美帝英帝法帝政治慈善的目的在瓦解和滲透中國。切莫重蹈覆轍！學習蘇聯及其他五十個民族政權被演變掉的冷戰歷史教訓！
NEDによる香港工作の証言ビデオ
Letters which requests the communist leaders (one was for Jiang Zeming; the new one was for Xi Jinping) democracy of Hong Kong were sent by the same infiltrators who called themselves 'democrats' in Hong Kong while they were funded and supported by imperialist NED, imperialist media and UK intelligence agencies. It proves that they are all in the same context from colonial era to the present. Stealth imperialism versus Chinese people.
Note: If the inserted video has some technical error to view, please visit the video page.
蘋果日報，壹傳媒，黎智英 Jimmy Lai Chee-ying, IRI and CECC Connection
You see main players of anti-China operations in Hong Kong including government authorities. Corruption, destabilization, colour revolution and transformation of morals. Hong Kong did not resolve its colonial status, but it maintained that by one country, two systems.
The problem is Rimsky Yuen, chief of Department of Justice HK who was demoralized by infiltrators of the department and UK imperialist medium Reuters still did not bring the major patrons of the Occupy Central which made 4 million dollar damage to HK economy to the court of justice. It proves that the department has been infiltrated by US/UK agents who leaked internal information of argument on review of 9.26.2014 case to US medium Reuters. Reuters is on the side of colour revolution.
Reuters reported that Yuen had overruled other legal officials when they advised against pursuing prison terms for the three activists.
Reuters did not show any informer of the news. Who are so called 'other legal officials'? These are the infiltrators to UK imperialists. Department of Justice of HK has been infiltrated to the certain extent.
URL1:http://www.doj.gov.hk/eng/about/soj.html
URL2:https://hk.news.yahoo.com/袁國強放生佔中港獨礙中央全面管治-222010058.html
URL3:https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-politics/tens-of-thousands-protest-in-hong-kong-over-jailing-of-democracy-activists-idUSKCN1B00CK
- In 1994, I led a delegation of the IRI, a part of the NED,
the Article 23 for Hong Kong, China to prevent Imperialist
Colour Revolutions and internal regime change that financed
and supported by US/ UK imperialists.
2016 Mong Kok Terrorism 旺角暴亂 Was Caused By NED-SC-職工盟HKCTU-支聯會HKASPDMC- 工黨- 李卓人 Connection
Note: If the inserted video has some technical error to view, please visit the video page.
Network of Young Democratic Asians?
亞洲青年民主網路;亞洲青年民主連線;亞洲青年民主陣線
Export of 'Democracy' is Anti-Democracy
Note: Some parts of this analysis were written in different languages for different regions' readers particularly due to responsibility of social practice in their own regions. And this analysis is kept updated and transformable anytime. However, its main focus is not western countries but it especially focuses Asia. Exposing their networks is an effective way of preventing imperialist conspiracies.
Recommended Author on this global political issue 'Stealth Imperialism' (a.k.a. Colour Revolution; Regime Change for imperialism) is Mr.William Blum.
URL: http://williamblum.org/
Don't forget that the most democratic intelligentsias are also located in USA. This is not anti-US but it is just anti-imperialism. Recovering true democratic values of USA is part of international struggles. We should not be racists.
I also recommend other insightful sites for recovering US democracy, please visit
The most recommended video on this topic 'Colour Revolution' is below:
URL: John Pilger's The War on Democracy (UK, 2007)
What is 'Colour Revolution'? 顏色革命是什麼？
The perfect definition of it is professionally done by Russians. It is a kind of nonmilitary method created during the Cold War era but it serves for traditional military causes without real fires among nuclear weapon-owned countries. This tactic is an alternative military tactic that complete regime change via internal agents within the targeted country or region. There are at least three phases for this regime change.
The 1st. phase is to evolve internal regime change by NGOs, oppositions, popular front and agents within the nation or region. See Soviet Union in 1987, there were more than 3 millions of anti-Soviet NGOs that funded by the West. It formed anti-communist 'popular front.'
The 2nd. phase is to instigate sabotages, strikes and military rebellions. Infiltrating workers' unions done by Solidarity Centre and US embassy. See March 22, 1991 Mine Strikes in Donbass. Military Coup is done by US embassy with oppositions in military. See Chile's 1973 Military Coup.
The 3rd. phase is direct military invasion by US forces. See Panama Invasion of 1989 and Iraq War in 2011. These regime changes were mixed with internal colour revolution methods. After failed attempts of colour revolution, US imperialist State Department decided to let the president's military forces to invade these nations. Thus, colour revolution is not a pure peaceful tactic. It is part of military invasion in the entire imperialist context.
Russian military officers now tied the term “Color Revolution” to the crisis in Ukraine and to what they saw as a new US and European approach to warfare that focuses on creating destabilizing revolutions in other states as a means of serving their security interests at low cost and with minimal casualties.
Source from https://www.csis.org/analysis/russia-and-“color-revolution”
“Attempts to impose homemade recipes for internal changes on other nations, without taking into account their own traditions and national characteristics, to engage in the ‘export of democracy,’ have a destructive impact on international relations and result in an increase of the number of hot spots on the world map.”
RIA Novosti
May 23, 2014 ‘Color Revolutions’ Cause Apparent Damage to International Stability – Lavrov
Source: http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/2014/05/26/color-revolutions-upset-global-stability-russian-foreign-minister/
In sum, so called 'colour revolution' (a.k.a. He-ping Yan-bian, 和平演變, peaceful internal transformation which named by ex-US ambassador to Soviet in 1947) is US and West imperialist attempt to impose homemade recipes for internal changes on other nations, and creating destabilizing fake uprisings as a means of serving their security and economic interests at low costs, minimal risks of direct conducts of dirty wars and with minimal casualties. China is the largest target for its Asia strategy.
所謂和平演變失敗後的最後階段是軍事行動。如1989年美軍入侵巴拿馬的例子。顏色革命是種非軍事的軍事手段！破壞當地治安及經濟的政治手段！新的隱形軍事活動。它並非純粹和平合法的！攪局必定是其本質。
美帝所發動的更替外國政權的秘密或公開作戰，和平演變，顏色革命都是同義詞。美帝同時進行秘密顛覆作戰與公開攻打對方的作戰。看看智利在1973年政變以及巴拿馬1989年美軍侵略。此兩件經典事件都最具其典型性。其實，有無資本主義，是否左右政權其實都無絕對關係。美帝都為其跨國利益堆左右外國政權發動了顛覆行動。
NOYDA=NED Colour Revolutionary Network of Young Asians
NED-funded Taiwan Sunflower Movement, Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution, Việt Tân VOICE, SFT and the student group SEALDs (ReDEMOS, Public 4 Future) from Japan reached the agreement to establish international fake-grass-roots-movement network for future joint-operations at Manila gathering in April 2016! The NED network called NOYDA.
NED=NDI=ADN=USAID=CIA mentioned in the document so called '2012 Strategy Document,' NED is going to establish cross-regional networks of activists which including recruit of young people. In 2017, SEALDs was already an old name of the same organization. It is now called ReDEMOS and Public 4 Future.
See the document: www.ned.org/docs/strategy/2012StrategyDocument.pdf
在NED的「2012 Strategy Document」中，NED的重要目標之一，就是建立跨境激進分子網絡，當中年輕人便是計劃的主要構成部分。'' See more: https://hkgpao.com/articles/83167
反中亂港黑金如何從海外湧進來？
香港の反中カラー革命の資金は何処から来るのか？
What happens in Hong Kong, China is exactly the same with what happened in Soviet Union in 1991! For stealth imperialists, HK is a gate to steal China.
和平演變，如今俗稱顏色革命在回歸後的香港不斷發展中！其目的在瓦解和滲透中國！
香港で起きていることは１９９１年のソビエトに起きたことと同様である！狙いは中国にある。カラー革命は全世界の労働者階級及び民主主義への背離である！
和平演變，如今俗稱顏色革命在回歸後的香港不斷發展中！其目的在瓦解和滲透中國！
香港で起きていることは１９９１年のソビエトに起きたことと同様である！狙いは中国にある。カラー革命は全世界の労働者階級及び民主主義への背離である！
Hong Kong's NED fund was done via Hong Kong-based NDI
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) serves as a conduit for the US Congress to channel US Government funds to the NED’s four core grantees to conduct programs around the world. Hong Kong has been the target of such funding since 1994.
-Kevin Law
Source:http://nedprogramsinhk.blogspot.hk/2016/08/international-republican-institute.html
全米民主主義基金は、反中工作で御馴染みのCECCも属する米国議会のケーブルであり、米国政府、国務省の資金をその４つのコア組織に流すためにマネーロンダリングをする。これは、世界的にそれらのプログラムを実行するためである。香港は、１９９４年からこのターゲットになっている。米国二大政党は、この国家制度と一体化しており、共和党は、全米民主主義基金の組織の一つIRIを持ち、民主党は全米民主主義基金の組織の一つNDIを持ち各自、他国の政権転覆と民主主義の偽装の下にネオリベを推進してきた。
中情局主要基地是位於美國領事館。NDI是美國民主黨，IRI是美國共和黨。都在中國滲透工作上毫無分別！香港的民主黨與此兩黨的勾結極為密切！
NDI香港エージェントと、いわゆる民主派（対米隷属派）の立法委員との共謀のビデオ記録
Note: If the inserted video has some technical error to view, please visit the video page.
URL:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HanLgkia9LM
再有鐵證踢爆反對派與外國勢力同流合污，企圖搞禍香港。有影片顯示在反對派上次發動所謂的“五區公投”前夕，反對派成員曾經和接受美國政府資助的美國國際民主研究院的成員以及一眾外國學者見面，商討如何利用行動來發展勢力。當中更加提出要利用網路社交平台以及青少年來壯大行動的聲勢，顯示外國勢力早在很久之前就已經入侵到香港的立法會當中；而一眾反對派議員就甘為外力所用，出賣香港。
全國人大常委會法工委副主任張榮順在早前的基本法研討會上強調，香港基本法不是為“某些勢力”提供舞台，讓其有機會奪取香港管治權。反對派卻“詐傻扮懵”，聲稱不清楚“某些勢力”為何物，但這個偽裝卻馬上拆穿。
今次的片段源自於2009年11月15日，香港反對派與包括NDI成員在內的外國學者在相信是香港某一地點討論“五區公投”的研討會片段的連結。片段出現的人物包括，美國政府資助的美國國際民主研究院項目經理Belinda Winterbourne、項目主任Stephen Tong、“歐洲運動及公投研究所”（Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe）主席Burno Kaufmann等外國學者。令人驚訝的是，時任立法會議員的何秀蘭、“全民投票實踐計劃”成員的范國威及社民連政策研究員楊繼昌赫然也是活動的席上賓。
在影片中，Belinda Winterbourne高調錶示，隨著Facebook這類社交網路平台逐步普及，網際網路是“最好的教育及提供資助渠道”，提示要策動更多的網路言論來為市民“洗腦”。Burno Kaufmann則指“學生和學院的參與是關鍵因素”，因為這樣才可以建立將來的“活躍分子、選民及決策者”。
身為港人的楊繼昌對於這些出賣香港的言論不但沒有反對，反而表示是次的所謂“公投”是一個策略，目的是要動員市民，成就首次以投票來反對中央政府的行動，藉此向中央政府發出訊息。在旁的何秀蘭擔心言論泄露，連忙補充指，在該房間中所説的事都要保密。
這段影片的鏈接源於“Hong Kong Democracy Watch（香港民主監察）” Kevin Law日前向樑家傑發出公開信。信件除了以該段影片作為外國勢力插手香港內部事務的實證外，還批評樑家傑一方面與美國政府同流合污，另一方面卻擺出虛偽的姿態，挑戰質疑張榮順的言論。
NDI is officially considered that it has been engaging in destabilization of Hong Kong since 1997. However, Kevin Law, Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor indicated that they have been funding anti-China scholars since 1995. Approximately more than 30,000,000 HKD had been spent on colour revolution in Hong Kong, China. NDI's main financial target is See the NDI and HK Agitators' Meeting Video. It proves that NDI and Anti-China agitators' cooperation is not a kind of 'Conspiracy Theory'(Conspiracy theory is a label against criticism on CIA covert operations which named by CIA). NDI actually located in Hong Kong.
Resource: http://www.moonofalabama.org/2014/09/the-ned-hong-kong-riots.html
Above chart is not obsolete even in 2017. For example, HKUPOP is still working and publishes manipulated public opinion polls to demonize authority. Hong Kong University's faculties and students are infiltrated by NDI.
HKPOP's News: https://hk.news.yahoo.com/港大民研調查-林鄭月娥評分微跌-064900035.html
陰謀論是中情局塑造的對付批判的標籤。看看NED透過NDI資助和指導中國香港的反中亂港勢力的鐵證。這並非陰謀論，而是事實。
Kevin Law's Constructive work on NDI issues which titled
NDI圖在港搞「顏色革命」 大灑金錢操控反對派
See NED-NDI-HKU-HKPOP-CCPL-Tai Benny-Umbrella Movement Connection
大公網2015年9月12日訊 （記者冼國強）《大公報》早前獨家踢爆傳聞是港大副校候選人的港大法律學院前院長陳文敏與美國政府資助的「美國國際民主研究院」（NDI）合作，涉嫌協助外國勢力在香港進行政治活動，推動「占中」。有市民去信美國國會研究服務部（CRS）和美國駐港總領事館，投訴「占中」幕後黑手NDI企圖在香港推動「顏色革命」，不但危及中國國家安全，而且損害香港繁榮穩定以及中美關係，要求美國有關當局進行問責。
《大公報》近期接到「香港民主監察」成員KevinLaw來函，附上他日前致美國國會研究服務部（CRS）主任Mary B. Mazanec和美國駐港總領事夏千福（Clifford A. Hart）的信件。Kevin Law批評上述美國國會研究服務部今年六月九日發表的一份有關香港政改的報告內容失實。他質疑NDI亞洲部主任Peter Manikas向國會報告時隱瞞推動「占中」的情況，他亦在信中列出多個NDI資助和推動「占中」的證據。
大灑金錢操控反對派
Kevin Law指出，自1995年起，NDI共投入逾3000萬港元，操控本港反對派及滲透大專院校，資助多個所謂「研究」和「青年」項目，以學術研究和學術自由做掩飾，訓練本港政團和年輕人積極介入政治，企圖推動「顏色革命」。
Kevin Law更在信中舉例指，「占中」爆發前，NDI資助港大比較法與公法研究中心，推出「港人講普選」網上平台，聲稱讓網民可自行設計普選方案，但目的是推動 香港年輕人和學生在普選問題上更積極地參與政治。「占中」發生後，這個由美國資金建立的網站，馬上變成支援占領者的平台，包括曾建議占領者改用通訊軟體 「Firechat」；提供防毒面具的購買地址；呼籲示威者扔掉身上利器，以免被起訴藏有攻擊性武器；向示威者提供被捕時的應對方式和律師聯繫電話等。
Kevin Law強調，NDI資助和推動「占中」活動，不但危害中國國家安全，而且損害香港繁榮穩定以及中美關係，要求美國有關當局進行問責。
戴丑收黑金陳文敏經手
據港大審計委員會報告，港大法律學院副教授戴耀廷代表港大收受了261萬元捐款，其中四筆合共145萬元是匿名捐款，包括由陳文敏經手、用於舉 辦政制發展和法治教育講座的30萬元；用於港大民研計劃設立電子投票系統作為所謂「全民公投」的80萬元資金；20萬元及15萬元予港大人文學院捐款，以 支持院方進行「信仰與法律」研究及聘請研究助理，而這名研究助理曾多次協助處理與「占中」相關工作。
對於捐款來源，戴耀廷一直遮遮掩掩，校方要求他交代捐款者的身份，他竟花逾六星期才提交一個人名作「捐款人」，不符合學者處理捐款的「預期行為 標準」。對此，戴耀廷須接受校方三項懲處，包括不能擔任管理層職位、不得接受捐款和不可監督研究員，期限約數年。而陳文敏亦未解釋清楚當時處理戴耀廷轉交的匿名捐款時，是否支持他和金主關係，對於如何理解資金來源亦是避重就輕。
而當「占中」問題帳目愈揭愈多，「占中」收支及其核數報告仍未見蹤影。戴耀廷日前在記者一再追問之下，才聲稱「占中」帳目最快下月初會有結果。 然而，戴耀廷仍然死不悔改，死撐自己在處理「秘密捐款」一事並無違反規則，又質疑審核委員會批評他處理「秘密捐款」只是涉及一些「雞毛蒜皮」的程序及安 排，稱「不符期望標準」之說欠缺法律基礎，更威脅稱倘自己受懲處，不排除會提出司法覆核。
逾286萬元不知去向
根據「香港民主監察」的調查，「美國國際民 主研究院」（NDI）2012年，已從美國國家民主基金會（NED）獲得46萬美元，摺合港幣356.7萬元，其中有70.1萬港元用於資助港大，換言之 NDI仍有286.6萬港元不知去向。「香港民主監察」質疑這些資金大部分投放在大學和大學生身上，促請美國有關當局解釋。
「香港民主監察」成員KevinLaw日前去信美國國會研究服務部（CRS）主任Mary B. Mazanec和美國駐香港總領事夏千福（CliffordA.Hart），投訴NDI在香港資助和推動「占中」。
70.1萬捐予港大
Kevin Law指出，根據2012年NED的中國（香港）年報，NDI已從NED獲批得46萬美元，摺合港幣356.7萬元，但根據港大審核委員會的報 告，2012年起，NDI共資助港大70.1萬港元（詳見表），包括在「占中三丑」之一戴耀廷於2013年1月首次提出違法「占中」概念後，NDI資助港 大法律學院比較法及公法研究中心的兩個項目，用作與「民主」有關的一系列指定研究，前者涉款38.4萬元，後者涉款24.6萬元。此外，NDI亦在 2014年11月資助鍾庭耀的港大民意研究計劃6.6萬港元，做有關政改的調查。
Kevin Law認為，NDI仍有286.6萬港元不知去向，美國有關當局有必要解釋。他又說，由於NED在撥款給NDI時表明，有關資金是用於提升大學生對政治改革的參與度，因此他推斷NDI的大部分資金都是投放在大學和大學生身上。
Visit Kavin Law's Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor: http://www.hkhrm.org.hk/english/more/index.html
Also see the ex-NED bureaucrat's Testimony on HK Political Disturbances by NED and its puppets. NDI funding is NED funding in its true context and entirely US State Department funding. NED anti-China operations have been undergoing even in 1989. NED and its NDI are just part of anti-China NGOs which located in Hong Kong. China still did not eliminate colonial legacy and its ruling class in Hong Kong. It's caused by the 50 years of maintaining 'colonial' Hong Kong status since 1997. China should wholly remove colonial class relationships of Hong Kong. One Country-Two Systems was not the best way of recovering colony, that was the better cover for the political compromise, but it was in its nature, Chinese compromise to UK imperialism inHK.
香港相當於蘇聯當時的俄國，英美要求的政改是為了創造香港的葉利欽！香港的薩哈羅夫為李柱銘，香港的波波夫為李卓人！ 除了人權，自由，民主，獨立以外，一國兩制的幌子也是西方帝國主義攻擊中港領導層的政治工具！一旦港版葉利欽上台後，就會禁止中央及其中共在香港境內的活動。就澳門而言，也就會是如此。
一國兩制是維持殖民地現狀五十年的意思。舊殖民特權階級都保留下來了。彭定康是其代表人物。舊殖民階級（除了土豪以外，曾統治香港的英國，加拿大，澳洲等白人殖民特權階級）如今變為反中亂港勢力了。一國兩制實踐上是對英國殖民主義以及葡萄牙殖民主義的妥協。反中亂港是美帝醞釀以及進行和平演變，顏色革命的現象。瀕臨崩潰時的末期蘇聯有極為相同之處。反共並非民主！資本主義並不等於民主主義！被洗腦的群眾誤以為自己自覺地選擇政治選項的時候，其實已被帝國主義植入思維的模式所操縱的。換言之，按照帝國主義及其媒體所希望的思路做判斷事情。這正是顏色革命參與者的共同心理狀態。打著民主自由維權的幌子進行擾亂，投機份子，索羅斯之流藉機放空當地股票大獲利！美帝英帝法帝政治慈善的目的在瓦解和滲透中國。切莫重蹈覆轍！學習蘇聯及其他五十個民族政權被演變掉的冷戰歷史教訓！
NEDによる香港工作の証言ビデオ
Letters which requests the communist leaders (one was for Jiang Zeming; the new one was for Xi Jinping) democracy of Hong Kong were sent by the same infiltrators who called themselves 'democrats' in Hong Kong while they were funded and supported by imperialist NED, imperialist media and UK intelligence agencies. It proves that they are all in the same context from colonial era to the present. Stealth imperialism versus Chinese people.
Note: If the inserted video has some technical error to view, please visit the video page.
National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, Solidarity Centre (SC) and Freedom of Information. The fund has been continued after the failed Umbrella Revolution in 2014.
For instance, in 2015, NDI Hong Kong claimed:
The largest domestic patron of anti-China Colour Revolution and US Congressional Organization for anti-China Operations
蘋果日報，壹傳媒，黎智英 Jimmy Lai Chee-ying, IRI and CECC Connection
The problem is Rimsky Yuen, chief of Department of Justice HK who was demoralized by infiltrators of the department and UK imperialist medium Reuters still did not bring the major patrons of the Occupy Central which made 4 million dollar damage to HK economy to the court of justice. It proves that the department has been infiltrated by US/UK agents who leaked internal information of argument on review of 9.26.2014 case to US medium Reuters. Reuters is on the side of colour revolution.
Reuters reported that Yuen had overruled other legal officials when they advised against pursuing prison terms for the three activists.
Reuters did not show any informer of the news. Who are so called 'other legal officials'? These are the infiltrators to UK imperialists. Department of Justice of HK has been infiltrated to the certain extent.
URL1:http://www.doj.gov.hk/eng/about/soj.html
URL2:https://hk.news.yahoo.com/袁國強放生佔中港獨礙中央全面管治-222010058.html
URL3:https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-politics/tens-of-thousands-protest-in-hong-kong-over-jailing-of-democracy-activists-idUSKCN1B00CK
Next Digital Ltd.-Democratic Party-NED-Civic Party-Republican Connection
You can see major anti-China political parties' leaders (Martin Lee of Democratic Party; Tanya Chan of Civic Party)have tight connection with Next Digital Ltd., Jimmy Lai Chee-yin who owns the largest anti-China medium, Apple Daily which sold in Hong Kong and Taiwan for attracting young people. On September 1 2017, the NED-funded Martin Lee and 4 to 5 foreigners (Mark Simon, Caucasian journalists and NED-related agents) gathered together at Jimmy's house for conspiracy on Howard Lam Tsz Kin 林子健's fake lynch incident in which he has been proved to be the director and performer of the fake PROC intelligence incident.
在中國香港的滲透工作上，IRI共和黨與NDI民主黨都沒分別。都在從事反中亂港！
Who is Mark Simon, Jimmy Lai's Right-Hand Man?
IRI in Hong Kong
International Republican Institute visit to Hong Kong in 1994
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) serves as a
conduit for the US Congress to channel US Government funds
to the NED’s four core grantees to conduct programs around the
world. Hong Kong has been the target of such funding since 1994.
conduit for the US Congress to channel US Government funds
to the NED’s four core grantees to conduct programs around the
world. Hong Kong has been the target of such funding since 1994.
The International Republican Institute (IRI) is one of the NED’s
four core grantees and represents the Republican Party in the NED.
It is a sister body of the National Democratic Institute (NDI),
which represents the Democratic Party.
four core grantees and represents the Republican Party in the NED.
It is a sister body of the National Democratic Institute (NDI),
which represents the Democratic Party.
IRI visit to Hong Kong
From 12 – 19 June 1994, the Republican Party sent an IRI team
of four lawyers, led by Dick Thornburgh to study the prospects
for the rule of law in Hong Kong in view of the impending 1997
reversion of Hong Kong to the People’s Republic of China1
(Page 342).
This was known as the Hong Kong Rule of Law Mission.
of four lawyers, led by Dick Thornburgh to study the prospects
for the rule of law in Hong Kong in view of the impending 1997
reversion of Hong Kong to the People’s Republic of China1
(Page 342).
This was known as the Hong Kong Rule of Law Mission.
According to Dick Thornburgh:
to conduct a study of the rule of law in Hong Kong, the
guarantees for its legal system in the Joint Declaration,
and the post-1997 prospects for the rule of law there2
(Page 15).
- There is great concern in Hong Kong about how the
Provisional Legislature will carry out the Basic Law's
Article 23 which requires the Hong Kong legislature to
pass laws against "subversion against the central people's
government," theft of state secrets,
and to prohibit Hong Kong political organisations
from establishing ties with foreign political organizations2
(Page 20).
- The United States simply must stand up for the people
of Hong Kong. As the strongest and most free nation in the
world, our leadership is crucial. It is more than a matter of
national interest, it is a matter of national honor2 (Page 24).
In his autobiography, ‘Where the evidence Leads’, Dick
Thornburgh made the following observations:
Thornburgh made the following observations:
- At the time of our visit, much of Hong Kong’s business
community espoused a pro-PRC, “don’t make waves” attitude.
Some business leaders believed that self-interest would require
the PRC to recognize the political aspirations of Hong Kong
residents in order to maintain the city’s economic vitality1
(Page 342).
- The real controversy is not, as would appear on the surface,
between Governor [Chris] Patten and the British Government
on the one hand, and the PRC on the other.
The real controversy is between those residents of Hong Kong
who are committed to human rights and the rule of law
and a business community unwilling to press the case
for these principles for fear of upsetting their present and
potential economic and financial relationships with the PRC1
(Page 343).
Key issues identified by Dick Thornburgh.
The following key issues were identified by Dick Thornburgh in this mission:
Article 23
Article 23 of the Basic Law was intended …
to prohibit Hong Kong political organizations from
establishing ties with foreign political organizations;
to prohibit Hong Kong political organizations from
establishing ties with foreign political organizations;
A divided community, not all of whom supported democracy
From the small number of interviews he conducted,
Dick Thornburgh found Hong Kong was divided in
opinion as to the future, with a limited number of
lawyers and a handful of politicians who wanted
American support to press for democracy and
a business community which trusted China to
deliver on its commitments.
Dick Thornburgh found Hong Kong was divided in
opinion as to the future, with a limited number of
lawyers and a handful of politicians who wanted
American support to press for democracy and
a business community which trusted China to
deliver on its commitments.
Comment
It is noteworthy that as early as 1994, Dick Thornburgh identified
that Article 23 was intended … to prohibit Hong Kong
political organizations from establishing ties
with foreign political organisations.
This would be of great concern to the NED,
because they realized this would preclude them from funding
and conducting programs in Hong Kong,
which helps explain why they funded the organization
of the Article 23 protests in 2003.
References
1Thornburgh . D. Where the Evidence Leads: An Autobiography,
Dick Thornburgh.
University of Pittsburgh Press, 12 Sep 2003.
2Dick Thornburgh. 1997. Rule of Law in Hong Kong: Some
Implications for U.S. Policy, 18 J. Int'l L. 15 (2014).
Available at: Rule of Law in Hong Kong. 1997.
Comment:
Collapse of Soviet Union proved the necessity of the Article 23 for Hong Kong, China to prevent Imperialist
Colour Revolutions and internal regime change that financed
and supported by US/ UK imperialists.
Mark Simon is a typical advisor and secretary for Jimmy Lai, the friend of the Neo Liberalism guru Milton Friedman. His father was former CIA agent, and he himself was a former chairman of Republican's Abroad Hong Kong which serving republican policies in Hong Kong. NED funded IRI. His role is not only a contact person among Jimmy Lai, his anti-China agitators so called 'pro-democracy'citizens and US government and republicans. Moreover, his financial role in colour revolution is money laundering for Jimmy. In 2014, nationalist media disclosed their confidential documents and it revealed the financial sources of anti-China agitations. Simon, donations in serving foreign politics and bribing voters for its cause are illegal in US. They do it to other nations. Like Panama invasion and its bribed election in 1989. Imperialists are violating their own domestic laws.
Dubbed "the backstage man", Simon found himself taking centre stage after two massive leaks of documents and emails between Simon, Lai and other senior executives of the media group were released to the press in recent weeks.
They reveal discussions of Lai's financial support for pan-democrats and the planned Occupy Central pro-democracy protests, and Simon's role in the transfer of money.
Simon, Lai and Next Media did not contest the authenticity of the leaked documents but suspected the information was obtained through computer hacking. On Wednesday, the group formally reported to police that their computer system was targeted by hackers. The case is now under investigation
The donations were not illegal. But some pro-Beijing newspapers suggested the money originated in the United States, citing as evidence Simon's former intelligence job.
The leaked documents also seemed to suggest Simon helped Lai build relations with right-wing US politicians. In one case, Simon helped set up a meeting between former Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin and a group of pan-democrats during her visit to Hong Kong in 2009.
Source: http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1570781/im-not-spy-says-jimmy-lais-right-hand-man-mark-simon
https://hk.news.yahoo.com/黎智英夥四老鴿-追月夜密會攪局-223016830.html
https://hk.news.yahoo.com/黎智英夥四老鴿-追月夜密會攪局-223016830.html
Comment:
The amount of money does not include their media and various kinds of social supports.And also you can not ignore your local and domestic traitors who finances the NED-funded groups. Such as 黎智英 Jimmy Lai Chee-ying in Hong Kong and governmental bureaucracy in Japan.
The amount of money does not include their media and various kinds of social supports.And also you can not ignore your local and domestic traitors who finances the NED-funded groups. Such as 黎智英 Jimmy Lai Chee-ying in Hong Kong and governmental bureaucracy in Japan.
NED is just a money laundering method which run by US State Department. For China (Hong Kong, Main Land, Taiwan, Macau), NED funded groups are related with CECC (Congressional Executive Commission on China). CECC is one of main manipulators of US anti-China operations at congress.
Funding China regions is done by several units, 1) Regional China is Hong Kong, Hong Kong is anti-China centre for US / UK / EU imperialists. NDI funds Hong Kong University's Law Department, such as Tai Benny who is one of organisers of Umbrella Revolution.
Regional China (Hong Kong) fund in 2016.
Advancing Dialogue on Political Reform and Strengthening Legal Advocacy in China and Hong Kong
National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI)
$350,000
To assist in efforts to identify new avenues for democracy and political reform in Hong Kong. The institute will support efforts to focus public discourse on how democratic reforms can have a direct impact on livelihood issues, such as income inequality, pollution, housing, and education. The program will also support continued engagement with lawyers supporting the rule of law in China.
2) China (Hong Kong) fund is divided into two units. Such as SC (Solidarity Center) which funds notorious HKCTU 職工盟 and indirectly 支聯會 HKASPDMC via Cheuk-yan Lee 李卓人.
The trade union leader Cheuk-yan Lee 李卓人 is one of major organizers of HK colour revolution. His also a leader of Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements in China 支聯會 which is also funded by NED in this way. The other one is Freedom of Information which manipulating media and so called independent media for colour revolution.
NED and its SC in Hong Kong backed the 2016 Mong Kok Civil Unrest 旺角暴亂. For example, one of key agitators of this riot was Su Decheng 蘇德成 who used to be a secretary of NED-funded HKCTU. Cheek-yan Lee 李卓人 supported his failed trial until August 25, 2017. Ex-HKCTU secretary Su Decheng 蘇德成 and chairman of HKCTU Cheek-yan Lee 李卓人's corporation during the trial on the Mong Kok Terrorism 旺角暴亂 proved that the closed tie between them. The entire terrorist act was conspired by NED-funded HKCTU-Cheek-yan Lee connection. Colour revolution is an alternative violent method with the cover of peaceful uprising of the people. It involves actual violence like this. This kind of political student group is like Homeland and Freedom in Chile which guided by 40 first rank officers from state department of USA during anti-Allende colour revolution in 1973. Their aim is to destabilise domestic economy and create chaos among people's lives to lead people's grievance to
their targeted regime that protecting its country.
their targeted regime that protecting its country.
See also the news: http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20170825/00174_001.html
2016 Mong Kok Civil Unrest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Mong_Kok_civil_unrest
See more about NED-SC-職工盟HKCTU-支聯會HKASPDMC connection (Cheuk-yan Lee 李卓人 is a key person to this imperialist network):
NED funded World Uyghur Congress (WUC) and 黃台仰 Ray Wong Toi-yeung, Key Player of 2016 Mong Kok Terrorism 旺角暴亂
NED funded World Uyghur Congress (WUC has been proved that it's funded by NED since 2006) and the Uyghur American Association (UAA has been funded since 2002) are anti-China, Separatist movement groups for Western imperialism. Moreover, they have been proved to be part of NOYDA. Behind the 2016 Mong Kok Terrorism, there is a typical colour revolution network. Ray Wong Toi-yeung and NED-funded WUC network is a key to realising the political truth of the entire context. Who is behind the political event? This tight NED network around the criminal fugitive Ray Wong Toi-yeunghas been disposed while his meeting with WUC in Germany. Germany is US imperialist puppet, and its embassy in Hong Kong supports the NED supported oppositions. 別忘記德國駐港領事館（FB常被星島日報，香港電台轉播）也是助產反中亂港勢力的幫兇！德國，英國，美帝，本土民主前線，世界維吾爾代表大會，全美國民主基金會，旺角暴亂，黃台仰都形成反中顏色革命的組織網！逃犯黃台仰與NED資助的世界維吾爾代表大會在德國的會合並非偶然。
See Wikipedia:https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/世界維吾爾代表大會
NED funded WUC and Ray Wong Toi-Yeung in Germany
因涉嫌參與旺角暴亂而被控煽惑暴動等罪名的本民前召集人黃台仰，早前棄保潛逃遭法庭頒發拘捕令。近日網傳一張相片，疑為黃台仰於10月初在德國與「疆獨」代表會面，或證他流亡德國。
黃台仰Facebook最後一次更新於11月12日，分享本民前對《國歌法》的評論，及後下落未明。近日網傳相片，顯示他與同樣正被香港法院通緝的本民前核心成員李東昇，於今年10月3日在德國慕尼黑，與世界維吾爾代表大會秘書長多里坤‧艾沙及世維會副主席Umit Hamit等人會面。資料顯示，黃台仰與李東昇最後一次公開露面，則為今年9月到倫敦出席佔領行動三周年紀念活動。
黃台仰及李東昇連同6名被告，包括剛退出本民前的梁天琦，被控於去年農曆新年發生的旺角暴亂中煽惑暴動、煽惑非法集結及暴動等罪名，案件將於明年1月18日開審，預計審訊80日。而黃早前獲法庭批准，保釋候審期間到德國出席活動，原定於11月20日返回大埔警署報到，但黃沒有出現，至11月22日須向法庭交出旅遊證件，同樣未有現身，李東昇亦因沒依期歸押，二人同被高院法官發出拘捕令。
Source:The NEWs
1. This NED-WUC-WAA-Germany-Ray Wong Toi-yeung Network proves that
本土民主前線 Hong Kong Indigenous is part of NED network.
2. 2016 Mong Kok Civil Unrest was organised by NED network. Ray Wong Toi-yeung is the key player. At least NED has tight connection with the 2016 Mong Kok Civil Unrest organisers.
This colour revolution network is typical example of separatist network which funded by NED and other Western imperialists. True leftists or true nationalists can support them? Definitely not!
NED Student Group HKFS and NED Worker Group HKCTU Connection
從學生會，學聯，到職工盟的顏色革命組織網
在港，民主示威，維權示威，工人運動以及學運是被利用而成為顏色革命的運動形式了。如此嚴重毀損了土生土長，從資本主義的弊端必然衍生的真正的工人階級運動！職工盟確實與學聯有密切關係。你看職工盟的幹部Leo Tang不僅是職工盟HKCTU幹部，也是學聯的幹部。顏色革命的行動網是周密地貫穿工人組織與學生組織！
蘇聯崩潰，六四以後，除了滲透當地工人組織以外，目前最主要的是滲透學生！也是滲透學生會，在香港，學生會其實是個不屬於學校的獨立社團。相當於非政府組織。
香港的大學學生會一點都不簡單，他們不是學校附庸組織，而是一個社團。八大學生會除了中大，其餘已向警務處申請了社團註冊，它們跟大學沒從屬關係，難怪學生會可以豪擲十幾萬買足球票而不必向納稅人交代了。
學生會社團的資金來源包括學生會費、新生登記費、校友資助、社會捐助、校方及政府撥款、產業和投資收益等，如果，黑金要進來，易如反掌，找個無名氏捐錢就成了。
的確，在末代萬古罪人彭定康 ( Imperialist, Colonialist, Chris Patten) 扶植了上述政治工具的土壤。在六年間(1989-1994)，破壞中大港大兩大菁英制，改採多增五間大學的措施是不能天真地歸咎於全球化現象。如今，學生會，學聯，職工盟之間的幹部流動的組織網絡證實了帝國主義顏色革命的戰略。為此鋪路的是彭定康的大學政策。非正式組織，非政府組織會演變成政黨，並組成陣線。不能夠固定地看待這些社團，非政府組織。也不能忽視，獨立媒體，獨立工會，黨營企業，政治化的私營企業（如實政圓桌般），外國政府機構，領事館等等反中亂港基地的各種組織形式。
You see NED funded worker group HKCTU's key member is NDI-funded HKFS member. Hong Kong NED funded worker group and NED's student movement group have tight connection. Leon Tang is the example. There is a cross-organizational line between HKCTU and HKFS. The former recruits student activist from HKFS. Students' Union in each university has a link with HKFS, and then having a connection with HKCTU's worker movement. Anti-China worker movement links anti-China student movements in Hong Kong.
Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia Regional NED Agent Jolovan Wham Persecuted by Singapore Police in 2017!
Patriots Grab their Colour Revolution Network below:
US State Department- NED - SC (Solidarity Center) - HKCTU 職工盟 and indirectly 支聯會 HKASPDMC - Cheuk-yan Lee 李卓人 - 香港眾志 Hong Kong Demosisto - Joshua Wong 黃之鋒- Jolovan Wham- The Speakers's Corner (its for Malaysian General Election 2013) - Singapore Subway Workers' Political Group 無聲抗議- SMRT Bus Driver Protest in Nov. 2012
Imperialist colour revolutionary (aka Exporter of 'Neo-Liberalism') in Singapore is Jolovan Wham.
He is one of NED agents who is active in Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore since 2012. Exposing his tight corroboration with NED networks is essential for true democracy of targeted countries in Asia. You can also count attendees of these political operations which organised by NED agents as one of them. Then, you can clearly know that which political organisations belonging to NED's political benefits, who is under control of foreign political schemes. As Mr.Putin said orderly news can provide essential knowledge on what is going on in the present political situations globally. Hong Kong has to ban foreign NPOs' political operations in Hong Kong. On the contrary to imperialist countries, These targeted regions' authorities are too kind to these neoliberal agents who are serve in true demon in the
contemporary political sphere. See their sentences are too light! It does not only prove that their fear of punishments from the imperialists, but also it prove that their targeted regions are more democratic than them.
1. Organising The Speakers' Corner in Singapore illegally to Affect Malaysian General Election in 2013.
21 Malaysians arrested at protest
2. Organising SMRT Bus Driver Protest in Hong Kong with SC-HKCTU-Cheuk-yan Lee 李卓人 in 2012.
The ongoing tension in Hong Kong between pro-democracy group and HKSAR government over the future administration of Hong Kong is partly sustained by Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Union(HKCTU), an independent union movement in Hong Kong.
Singaporeans are not aware that the Secretary-General of HKCTU, Mr Lee Cheuk-Yan, once led a protest in Singapore Consulate in Hong Kong in December 2012. That protest demanded Singapore government for the immediate release of the SMRT bus drivers who were involved in the strike in November 2012.
Lee is now being accused of being funded by International Labor Solidarity, an organization under National Endowment for Democracy (NED). It is open knowledge that NED receives its funding from U.S Department of State.
Jolovan Wham managed to instigate Panasonic factory workers to gather for a sit-in protest outside Ministry of Manpower in 2012, and he was actively involved in “fighting” for the rights of SMRT bus drivers who were involved in the illegal protest.
Why is Lee, a Hong Konger and a politician interested in SMRT bus strikes?
What is the connection between Wham and Lee and SDP and the State Department of United States?
3. Organising illegally Dec. 2016 'Popular Resistance and Social Movement forum', Jun. 2017 Subway Workers' group Gathering and July 2017 Changi Prison Protest. Joshua Wong illegally engaged the political event which hosted by his Singapore corroborator Jolovan without legal authorisation from the Singapore police.
【本報訊】香港眾志秘書長黃之鋒去年十一月獲邀透過通訊應用軟件Skype遙距參加新加坡一個論壇，據報論壇負責人、新加坡社運人士Jolovan Wham遭起訴，指他於去年及今年多次在未獲警方許可下組織公眾集會，涉嫌違反當地公安條例。新加坡傳媒報道，Jolovan Wham獲准以八千新加坡元保釋，案件預審會議將於下月十三日進行。
新加坡警方日前檢控現年三十七歲男子Jolovan Wham，多次未獲警方許可組織公眾集會，涉嫌違反公安條例，共涉及七項控罪，包括去年十一月二十六日舉行一場有關公民抗命及社會運動的論壇，邀請黃之鋒透過Skype遙距演講；除此以外，Jolovan Wham被指於今年六月在當地地鐵組織「無聲抗議」，以及於今年七月在樟宜監獄外組織並且參與非法公眾集會。
黃未獲工作許可及警方許可
Jolovan Wham於去年十二月曾於社交網站透露，自己被新加坡警方帶返警署問話，並引述警方指黃之鋒是「外國人」，即使只是透過Skype參與公眾論壇，主辦單位亦需先獲得工作許可及警方許可。
根據新加坡法例，任何人在未經警方許可下組織或參與公眾集會屬刑事罪行，一經定罪，初犯者最高會被判罰款五千新加坡元，重犯者最高會被判罰款一萬新加坡元及監禁六個月。
Macau's pro-NED politician Sulu Sou 蘇嘉豪 and its Associação de Novo Macau 新澳門學社 has close tie and the same mission in Macau politics. In Dec. 7, 2017, his position at parliament was stopped due to his illegal engagement in illegal political gathering in front of House of Chief Executive of Macau Special Administrative Region.
This incident is similar to Jolovan Wham's illegal engagement in Singapore. The advisor is the same. And they belong to the same political forces that called NED. And they showed the close relationships with each other. NOYDA is NED, NED is US State Department.
There is a political network Sulu Sou-Associação de Novo Macau-NOYDA-Jolovan Wham-NED. Taiwan and its Taiwan University Politics Department are in serve of educating this kind of political puppets like Sulu Sou and Sunflower movement leaders that under control of US state department for its imperialist benefits.
(星島日報報道)最年輕的澳門立法會民主派議員蘇嘉豪，被控去年五月在特首官邸外非法集會，及沒按警方指示離開，涉觸犯「加重違令罪」，根據澳門法例，被檢控的議員必須先中止職務，法院才可審理案件。澳門立法會昨召開全體會議，最終以二十八票贊成和四票反對，通過表決中止蘇嘉豪議員職務，今日起生效，直至案件審訊結束。蘇嘉豪成為澳門特區政府成立後，首位立法會議員因涉刑事罪被中止職務。
澳門立法會全體會議昨午約五時進行不記名投票，在蘇嘉豪不可投票的情況下，最終以大比數的二十八票贊成、四票反對，通過中止直選議員蘇嘉豪的職務，讓法院可以就「加重違令罪」的刑事檢控安排他應訊。澳門立法會主席賀一誠在表決後說明，蘇嘉豪繼續保留議員資格，期間可自由出入立法會，但暫時不能行使立法權、參與議案討論或表決，薪津和福利則維持不變。至於中止職務的期限，立法會並無決定，視乎法院刑事審訊的程序和結果。
蘇嘉豪表示感到遺憾，顯示大部分議員不理會立法會獨立性和尊嚴，但相信司法系統會還他清白，令他恢復議員職務，又呼籲澳門人千萬不要放棄或絕望，指停職只是一個階段。他質疑，現行法律不容許一個帶著職務的立法會議員去到法院應訊，「為何出庭作為證人，或作為嫌犯應訊之前，需要得到執行委員會的許可呢？」
由於根據大會程序，蘇嘉豪不被允許陳述或自辯，他曾發表抗辯聲明，請議員衡量他於去年五月的行為，並無侵害社會法益，以及立法會本身行使立法、監察政府和服務市民利益的重大職責，希望議員投票時考慮整體大局，他又指若澳門政府不用心處理社會問題，而去「處理」提出問題的人，壓抑的就不止是年輕人，而是牽動未來二、三十年發展的一代人。
China (Hong Kong) fund in 2016.
Expanding Worker Rights and Democracy
Solidarity Center (SC)
$133,600
To advance worker rights and democracy and strengthen the development of civil society. The center will support partners to strengthen democratic trade union efforts, including organizing, collective bargaining and advocacy skills. Project activities will raise public awareness and promote community participation on worker rights issues.
Supporting Free Expression in Hong Kong
Freedom of Information
$54,000
To strengthen a community of writers and journalists committed to defending free expression. The grantee will work with local writers and journalists to advocate for free expression in Hong Kong through solidarity building and public events calling attention to diminishing freedom of information.
Open society Foundation: One of Origins of Anti-China Colour Revolution
位於香港的危機：亞洲金融風暴炒主以及顏色革命金主之一，反中投機份子
Putin testimony: Soros is one of colour revolution conspirators!
Besides NED-NDI, George Soros Office is also located in Hong Kong. George Soros's Open Society engaged many colour revolutions and destabilization for overthrowing national regimes. It aims at Neo Liberalisation of targeted countries and regions. Victims were Soviet Union on agricultural destruction by infiltrated Soviet officers, Afghanistan Socialist Regime that doomed in Afghanistan War, overthrowing of El Salvador leftist regime in 1982, colour revolution of Poland in 1989 which also funded by NED's Freedom House. Support of The Dalai Lama on Tibet disturbances in China etc. Open Society's engagement on Neo-Liberalisation of targeted countries is not a conspiracy theory but it is true. Open Society is one of CIA functions on the scheme, and it cooperate with other colour revolutionaryimperialist organisations. Thus,you can not just see one group's engagement in one political issue in China.
More about George Soros: http://keywiki.org/George_Soros_-_Political/Financial_Stances
Soros funded Umbrella Revolution and Hong Kong government to prevent the article 23 of the Basic law in Hong Kong.
新自由主義顏色革命投機者索羅斯與香港政治動盪與停滯之間的關聯
[不重推基本法23條立法 官商議員勾結外國勢力]
索羅斯基金管理有限公司"SFM HK Management Ltd"早已進駐"IFC 2期" ! 從2014年佔中期間早已經大手狙擊沽空股票 , 更與香港政府高官及立法㑹犯民異猿有金錢交往 ! 而某幾位被委任的政府司局長官員及"立法會大議員" , 早已勾結外國勢力 , 據聞在佔中期間更因此而獲利豐厚 ; 而且 , 在金融市場投資獲利亦無需向有關政府部門及立法會申報投資利益 !
司局署長高官及"立法會大議員"這種合法的"金融投資方法"獲得豐厚金錢利益 , 廉政公署介入亦極難調查檢控 !
帖文 : 中國心志願軍 2017-06-09 02:39
Comment: Soros is one of financial sources of anti-China colour revolution, and its destabilization of the society and its market is also resource of investment profits for Soros. He actually manipulated the Hong Kong stock market during the destabilization of anti-China colour revolution, Umbrella Movement in 2014. Soros opposes implementation of the article 23 of the BASIC LAW and successfully corrupted the HK government to do not try reintroducing the article.
黎智英與索羅斯的資助對象大致一致！索羅斯已行賄港府，尚未檢控佔中搞手以及阻礙二十三條立法的背後有黑金！田北俊，田北辰兄弟也阻止二十三條立法時有過發揮作用。建制派內部也有田北俊，田北辰兄弟般的背叛者！國歌法是節下來的新課題！敵人揚言阻絕它！
絕不可讓帝國主義的代理人得逞！索羅斯證言中國動盪為外力所干涉！
"For China, the crisis is something affecting them from the outside,"
-Soros, 79, said to Bloomberg in July.
Soros's Hong Kong office is located in Hong Kong island, and it called
SFM HK Management Limited 索羅斯基金管理(香港)有限公司
Founded in HK: August 4, 2011.
HK Corporate Registration Number: 1655640
HK Status: Present
新自由主義顏色革命投機者索羅斯的網頁被駭後，索羅斯的秘密政治慈善活動是這位新自由主義者製造動亂，以此放空當地股票牟取私利的假民主工具了。他們組織辦公室卻在香港島了。索羅斯的黑金是與NED相同功能的政治毒害。比如，在戈爾巴喬夫政權時，索羅斯行賄蘇聯農業官吏進行破壞其農業基礎，以此迫使蘇聯屈從索羅斯以政治讓步為代價的農業產品出口！在天安門事件時，在天安門廣場裡，物資缺乏的狀況之下，可樂始終沒缺，大量可樂的資源是來自美帝英帝法帝的黃雀行動網。雨傘革命時，也是大量的高價英國紳士雨傘從哪裡來的？當然是美帝NDI以及當地漢奸以黎智英為首的黑金。
有關索羅斯黑金與陸港台的政治動亂之間的關係
Note: If the inserted video has some technical error to view, please visit the video page.
Imperialist Funding Network and Information Network
Note: I have to add USAID and UNDP to the chart. 藝術文化，學術活動，交換學生，留學援助計畫等等也都是滲透工作的環節和形式！
For instance, Asia Society (Admiralty, Hong Kong) is the Rockefeller Foundation to infiltrate and penetrate local artists and academicians via art-cultural events. Besides these imperialist organisations, local oppositional organisations which apply for imperialist funds also should be considered as internal threats. Not all threats are from outside. Colour revolution is internal operation, and its factor is internal one.
Comment: CSIS is famous for Japan handlers who are neoliberalism and neoconservatism. CSIS searched and deeply analyzed Soviet NGOs (more than 30,000 of West-Supported anti-Communist NGOs after 1987) by one of them on the Volume XII, Number 5 Significant Issues Series, ''After Perestroika: Democracy in the Soviet Union''. They tend to research and summaries targeted countries opposition groups in details. In 2015, they also did that in the exactly the same way in Japan. SEALDs was positively reviewed by this big supporter of Abe-regime while SEALDs was supposed to be antagonist role to Abe-regime.
US-Japan Relations:
Official Cooperation, Domestic Challenges
Official Cooperation, Domestic Challenges
Sheila Smith, Council on Foreign Relations Charles McClean, University of California, San Diego
Outside on the streets of Nagatacho, thousands of Japanese citizens gathered to demonstrate their opposition to “Abe’s war bills,” echoing the sentiment that these new laws violated Article 9 of the Japanese constitution, the no-war clause. New and younger demonstrators, largely mobilized under the banner of SEALDs (Students Emergency Action for Liberal Democracy), registered an awakening of political consciousness not seen since the 1970s in Japan. Public figures, including scholars, artists, and actors, also joined in the criticism of the new laws as a threat to Japanese democracy. Although this activism has receded since the security legislation passed, the social movement seems to have taken on a life of its own as more and more younger Japanese continue to seek participation in SEALDs-sponsored – or inspired – gatherings in Tokyo and other cities across Japan.
Source:https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/1503qus_japan.pdf
Thus, that Manila conference 2016 was part of the NED strategy. In this international context, you can correctly understand the political phenomenon in your country or region holistically. Protect your true democratic social movement and nation from the infill traitors who manipulated by imperialists via multi-level structure. This is exactly the true enemy called, 'stealth imperialism' that under-oppressed people of the world have fought for decades since World War 2. Cold War has still been continuing even after 1991.
Lessons of Collapse of Soviet Union 1991
居安思危：蘇共亡黨的歷史教訓 (11.7. 1917-12.25. 1991)
蘇共是顏色革命＝和平演變的最大受害者！其瓦解的教訓是所有顏色革命受害國及地區應當學習的！
蘇聯的極大錯誤是固守其斯大林主義官僚獨裁，而一直無視和疏忽其培養廣大工人階級對生產機構的自我管理機制的建立。這阻絕了社會主義民主多黨制的可能性。取而代之的是反共政黨及反共非政府組織的茂盛。這最終導致了二十世紀社會主義體制的瓦解！二十一世紀社會主義追求基於生產手段公有制的廣大工人階級的自我管理！這才是真正的民主主義！問題在是否代表工人階級或工人政黨，或官僚極權！工人專制，政黨專制，官僚專制都不同！只有以工人階級代表其階級利益是反對新自由主義的正確道路！政黨專制往往隱藏官僚極權統治。歷史已證明官僚極權統治轉變為資本階級獨裁。百分之七十五的前蘇共官僚轉變為新俄國官僚。最忽略的是工人階級對生產機構的自我管理機制的建設！這就是社會主義民主多黨制的基礎！另外，未被侷限於少數生產機構的資本主義機制導致整體工人的失業可能性（勞動市場的形成以及失業的本質性需要）以及收入失衡的貧富差距！蘇聯始終維持了對資本主義的高度限制，這是正面的！中國社會主義市場經濟的正面成果是讓三億人口擺脫了貧困。
The Possible Danger is Regime Change, Imperialist Infiltration and Colour Revolution in peace time.
Soviet Union collapsed due to colour revolution organized by US. Our lesson is below:
1) Effectively regulate NGOs, especially foreign related political NGOs who stands for imperialist causes under the name of 'Democratisation', 'Human Rights Protection' etc.. however, privatized commercial corporation is also a hidden form of political party on colour revolution. Like Taiwanese political parties have their privatized 'party-run-companies' in China to conduct political disturbances.
Hong Kong is the centre of anti-China NGOs and their paradise. In Soviet Union, they took form of social clubs, then gradually developed into economic-political parties to form of popular front for colour revolution. HK follows this mess. However, Stalinist bureaucracy is fatal to prevent colour revolutions. Stalinist bureaucracy can not get popular support. Soviet Union was threatened by thirty thousands of unregulated NGOs that are manipulated by anti-communists, imperialists and capitalists in 1987.
Anti-Soviet international organisations are pretty famous. Such as Amnesty International. They also support anti-China movements, NED-funded NOYDA and its Occupy Central. NOYDA Facebook page shared the article of Amnesty International. See the link below:
黨營企業以外，非政府組織依然是滲透當地的典型手段，它不僅可以發會政黨功能，也最終變成真正的政黨。
Benedict Rogers被拒入境是正確！促使政府釋放所謂政治犯是種和平演變手段！香港並無政治犯！
民主黨，香港殖民特權階級，彭定康，英國保守黨，羅哲思與雙學三子之間的聯繫也藉此曝光了。不斷來訪當地接觸和鼓勵反對派（扶植工作對象）是典型的顏色革命工作。
民主黨人士不斷濫用議員特權拜訪和鼓勵雙學三子，舊殖民統治特權階級的象徵彭定康也直接聲援了監獄中的雙學三子，甚至此次英國保守黨副主席羅哲思（Benedict Rogers）也原本打算促使港府釋放雙學三子，為此特定計畫拜訪雙學三子。
這種壓力是種和平演變的手段！當年戈爾巴喬夫受到美國對蘇援助計畫上的威脅，而給反共反蘇份子薩哈羅夫釋放出來，結局是反共勢力滲透人民代表大會了。此個別政治讓步逐漸助產了政改的方向。領導層的退讓是政改的開始！這就是和平演變的真面目。絕不能漠視帝國主義的代理人接觸和鼓勵搗亂份子的頻繁活動！意在漸漸獲得對反對行動的退讓！此種讓步累積起來成為政改。放虎歸山是蘇聯瓦解的錯誤！
庇護英國保守黨副主席羅哲思的組織是顏色革命組織之一的Human Rights Watch! 甚至，英國保守黨副主席羅哲思本身自己曝光了陰謀！就是他意在香港建立抗議港府以及攪局的非政府組織！非政府組織是潛政黨組織！它最後可以成為政黨！滲透當地的典型形式！
HK should learn Cambodian Government: NDI-US State Department- Multi-National Business Society-Open Society Network Expelled by Cambodian Government
NDI is a US government and US-European corporate-funded organization chaired by representatives from America’s business and political community. It is not only funded by US State Department (NED).
https://journal-neo.org/2017/08/27/cambodia-exposes-expels-us-network/
https://journal-neo.org/2017/08/27/cambodia-exposes-expels-us-network/
Cambodian government did a great job to expel the NDI in the country. NDI in HK is also no registration and tends to do tax evasion on its operations. First of all, requiring foreign and domestic NGOs to strictly register and report taxation. Then, ordering US-funded organisations to halt its political operations and expelling its foreign staffs which closely work with opposition parties. It is adequate that foreign political interference to domestic politics is illegal, thus Cambodian government correctly and rationally took the right to expel the imperialists. Why HK government can not to do this way? NDI is not only funded by US state department, but also it's funded by out side business society and Open Society (Soros) like below:
What NDI Really is and What it Really Does
Directors with particularly prominent conflicts of interests include:
Madeleine Albright: Albright Stonebridge Group and Albright Capital Management LLC
Harriet Babbitt: Council on Foreign Relations
Robert Liberatore: former senior vice president of DaimlerChrysler, an NDI financial sponsor
Bernard Aronson: former Goldman Sachs adviser
Howard Berman: senior advisor at Covington & Burling
Bernard Aronson: former Goldman Sachs adviser
Howard Berman: senior advisor at Covington & Burling
Richard Blum: chairman of Blum Capital Partners
NDI director Thomas Daschle, for example, actually has foreign political parties as paying clients through is “Daschle Group,” including VMRO DPMNE based in Macedonia as revealed by The Hill. NDI is likewise active in Macedonia, providing support directly to VMRO DPMNE, even co-hosting events in the country according to NDI’s own social media account on Facebook.
In Southeast Asia, Freedom House, yet another subsidiary of NED, would provide extensive aid to opposition groups in Thailand led by ousted former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, with Freedom House director Kenneth Adelman (PDF) concurrently providing paid-for lobbying services to Thaksin Shinawatra himself.
It appears that such conflicts of interests are not the exception, but the rule indicating that NED and its subsidiaries including NDI pursue the collective corporate and financial interests of their boards of directors merely behind the guise of “strengthening democratic institutions.”
An examination of NDI’s corporate sponsors casts further doubts upon its alleged mission statement. Its financial sponsors, according to NDI’s 2005 annual report (PDF), include:
- British Petroleum
- Bell South Corporation
- Chevron
- Citigroup
- Coca Cola
- DaimlerChrysler Corporation
- Eli Lilly & Company
- Exxon Mobil
- Honeywell
- Microsoft
- Time Warner
Donors also include convicted financial criminal George Soros’ Open Society Foundation as well as the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) of which NDI is a subsidiary of, as well as the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the US State Department itself.
Corporations like BP, Chevron, Citigroup, Coca Cola, Exxon, defence contractor Honeywell and IT giant Microsoft are not interested in promoting democracy. They are using democracy promotion as a means behind which to create conditions more conducive to expanding markets and increasing profits. This includes undermining governments impeding foreign corporate control of national resources and markets, or entirely removing and replacing governments with more obedient client regimes.
The contemporary history of American foreign wars and its practice of “regime change” and “nation building” provides self-evident confirmation of the motives and means used to expand US hegemony and clearly illustrates where organisations like NDI fit into the process.
In Cambodia’s case, a much larger, overarching agenda is in play than merely national resources and markets. US activities in Cambodia to coerce or replace the current government in Phnom Penh is done specifically to encircle and contain China through a united front of client states assembled by the United States across Southeast Asia.
Cambodia, along with the rest of Southeast Asia, has begun strengthening ties with Beijing economically, politically and militarily. Large infrastructure programmes, weapon acquisitions, joint-training exercises and trade deals are all on the table between Beijing and Phnom Penh.
The US, conversely, has provided few incentives beyond its failed Trans-Pacific Partnership scheme and coercion through networks like NDI and the myriad media and political proxies they fund and operate in Cambodia.
With NDI shuttered, its foreign staff expelled and the organisations and publications it was funding facing similar closures and evictions, it appears what little the US had on the table has been swept away. Cambodia’s particularly bold move may be replicated across Southeast Asia where similar US networks are maintained to manipulate and coerce the political processes of sovereign states.
Comment: Coca Cola supported Tien An Men Colour Revolution of 1989. There were bunch of cokes served for the local agent students in Tien An Men square in 1989 in China.
https://journal-neo.org/2017/08/27/cambodia-exposes-expels-us-network/
https://journal-neo.org/2017/08/27/cambodia-exposes-expels-us-network/
Comparison between Imperialist 'Promoting Democracy' and True Democracy of People
True Democracy is self-management and self determination by the working class/people in its true values. Self-determination and self-management are impossible when outsiders, foreign business interests attempting to influence the political economic process of other nations via US or UK imperialist local agents. Exporting or Promoting Democracy from abroad is contradiction. Moreover, so called 'Democracy' will be turned out to be 'Neo-Liberalism' at the end of its political and economical disturbances. HK should learn what Russia, Cambodia and Mainland China did on foreign disturbances on its domestic politics. Only traitors to its motherland listen to imperialists.
2) Disclosing facts of covert operations, domestic traitors and conspiracies.
3) Censor and monitor media, especially anti-government media, independent media, and major imperialist media like CNN, BCC, AFP, Voice of America, Freenet (set up by USAID and UNDP during Tulip Revolution) and so force. For Cambodia, the imperialist media are US-funded Cambodia Daily News Paper, Radio Free Asia and Voice of America. Yahoo is also part of it. Yahoo financed Harry Wo who is a famous anti-China, 'pro-human rights' role to demonise Chinese authority for the sake of imperialist colour revolution. Yahoo actually donated US$170,000,000 to Harry Wo for the 'pro-human rights' operations in China in 2007. See the New York Times news below:
Foreign government such as UK publishes 'Six-Months Report on Hong Kong' in every half year. This kind of reviewing by foreign government is also political pressure to disturb HK government. It is clear that Joint Declaration was seemed to be legally effective by UK. And what they want to keep is One-country, Two Systems (Maintaining UK's colonial prestigious status in HK for fifty years). So called 'political reform' is required in the report. It is a typical example of interrupting foreign country's domestic affairs. The report and their past colonialist profile are not even eligible to state in that way. UK's colonial legacy and its privileged status are violation of human rights of HK natives.
Imperialist Media in Hong Kong that Support NOYDA, NED Colour Revolution Network
1. Sounth China Morning Post
2. HKFP (Hong Kong Free Press)
3. RTHK 香港電台
4.Channel News Asia
5.Apple Daily News 頻果日報
6.Next Digital Ltd. 壹傳媒
NOYDA's web site publicly shows us which media are contributors of NED colour revolutions in Asia. They do not only support Hong Kong-located NED agitators and its political organisations, but also it reports news for imperialists' benefits and its operations in Asia. Hong Kong government has to close RTHK or purge its infiltrators who cites news of Voice of America for anti-China operations.
4) Stick to the benefits of the working class. There is no abstract human values like imperialist teaches. In class society, there is the class struggle.
Hong Kong also does not care about working class. It is highly neoliberal society.
5) Preventing pro-independent movements within nation. Imperialist exploits the opportunity to destabilize your country. Separatism is called by so called 'national democratic movement.' Violence on minority ethnics is doomed to death.
Hong Kong has been suffering from pro-HK independence movement. Separatism is in active.
6) Don't accept IMF and its shock doctrine for their economic funding. Funding is to destroy your people's government. The critical and typical mistake done by Soviet was 1975 August Helsinki Final Act Agreement between US and Soviet. Since then, US imperialist NGOs and colour revolution agitators are able to freely act in Soviet. The empire exploited the 'human rights' article to pressure and threaten Soviet systematically, and they set up monitoring groups in Soviet.
Hong Kong also has this kind of international agreement with Western countries that called One Country, Two Systems.
7) Not only workers, media, but students and universities are also targeted for infiltration. For example, student exchange program is for brainwashing targeted countries' upper class students.
Hong Kong's colour revolution was conducted by student agitators such as anti-China student centre HKU. And Umbrella Movement costed more than 40 billion HKD for one month.
The end of Soviet Union was the typical example of result of colour revolution. The union did not ideologically and naturally fail, there were too many covert operations to destroy the economy and politics. Anti-communists and imperialists corroborated in collapse of Soviet Union. Although it is reactionary to want to go back to the era, it is still meaningful to think twice about the failure for future construction of true democratic society which governed by working class. Chinese scholars did the great job to analise the causes of the collapse of Soviet Union. The analyzing work is major contribution to the cause of socialism in post-Deng Xiao-ping era.
Religions, student movements, worker movements, human rights movements and separatist movements are fully used in anti-China operations.
Religions, student movements, worker movements, human rights movements and separatist movements are fully used in anti-China operations.
ソビエト連邦は、ネオリベのカラー革命により人為的に崩壊した。イデオロギーや原理において自壊したわけではないし、他のカラー革命と同様に内因と外因の両方の条件が揃っていた。アジェンデ政権のチリのケースと酷似している。ゴルバチョフの過ちは、反共勢力の幇助になりカラー革命の一翼を内側から担う形になった。彼に崩壊の責任がないわけではない。中共は彼を意図的なソ連の破壊者、スパイとは認定していないが、真の社会主義者とも認定していないし、その政治的過ちがカラー革命に道を開いたし、西側の帝国主義に利用された迎合者と見ている。
迎合、譲歩、主導権の喪失、反共主義者の擁護、西側の制度の輸入などの致命的な過ちがあった事実は否めない。カラー革命の動きに迎合するのは真の民主化とは同一ではなく、さらに過酷な状況へと国を追い込むになることを行動において理解していなかった。カラー革命の動き、異なる社会勢力同士の闘争は、民主化とは似て非なるものである。彼は、この３つを官僚的に混同していた。ペレストロイカとカラー革命が同一視されるまでになっている。民主化を資本主義化、ネオリベ化と同一視しているのが帝国主義である。彼は、ショックドクトリンであるハーバードプラン（５００日計画）を承認していた時点で社会主義から、労働者階級から逸脱していた。プーチンの見解は正しく、ゴルバチョフらは、いかに民主的な目標に到達するかを把握せず、結果的に国家及び経済を崩壊させる羽目になった。
また、マンデルの分析は、このソ連崩壊時のカラー革命の動きを把握していない。本論考は、カラー革命の冷戦のコンテクストでソ連崩壊を考察する。
迎合、譲歩、主導権の喪失、反共主義者の擁護、西側の制度の輸入などの致命的な過ちがあった事実は否めない。カラー革命の動きに迎合するのは真の民主化とは同一ではなく、さらに過酷な状況へと国を追い込むになることを行動において理解していなかった。カラー革命の動き、異なる社会勢力同士の闘争は、民主化とは似て非なるものである。彼は、この３つを官僚的に混同していた。ペレストロイカとカラー革命が同一視されるまでになっている。民主化を資本主義化、ネオリベ化と同一視しているのが帝国主義である。彼は、ショックドクトリンであるハーバードプラン（５００日計画）を承認していた時点で社会主義から、労働者階級から逸脱していた。プーチンの見解は正しく、ゴルバチョフらは、いかに民主的な目標に到達するかを把握せず、結果的に国家及び経済を崩壊させる羽目になった。
また、マンデルの分析は、このソ連崩壊時のカラー革命の動きを把握していない。本論考は、カラー革命の冷戦のコンテクストでソ連崩壊を考察する。
See the series of 8 videos on the lessons of Collapse of Soviet Union:https://www.bilibili.com/video/av7884218/
Colour Revolution's economical damages to HK: http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20141001/00176_017.html
Colour Revolution's economical damages to HK: http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20141001/00176_017.html
NEDとは、CIAの代理で国務省の意向で標的国、地域の政治的不安定化を惹起し、その外交目的を達するために、NGOなど民間団体を組織し、資金援助し大衆工作を行う機関である。JICA国際協力事業団は、日本における
URL:http://jica-ri.jica.go.jp/IFIC_and_JBICI-Studies/jica-ri/publication/archives/jica/seminar/pdf/2001_01.pdf
日本の反体制派運動の実態
日本の反対派は、市民連合及びSEALDs, ReDEMOS, 未来のための公共が、反動的な日本共産党による露骨な売り込みを軸として、ネオリベ及び社民混合の民進党を主として推している共通点をいつまで黙認するのかよくよく連敗から学び取るべきである。これは、異なる思想路線の問題ではなく、敵の側であるスパイとの共闘は、水と油の問題、糞と味噌の問題である。この二つの分離は必要な批判主張である。批判しつつ戦う以外にない。民進党候補を中心として反安倍闘争を利用してきた民進党の支持組織市民連合、公安のお友達である反原発連、リンチ及び乗っ取り集団のしばき隊の類と真の反対派の分離、ネオリベと社民の民進党内での分離などは分化工作に乗ることでなく、必要不可欠な戦略的差別化である。これが、２０１６年までの教訓である。
ちなみに、市民連合及びSEALDs, ReDEMOS, 未来のための公共は、非政府組織である。そして、これらはいつでも政党へ変化しうる。日本の反対派を統制誘導するための米帝の傀儡である。日本には、このままでは本物の反対派がなくなる日が来る。対米隷属二大政党制は、真の反対勢力を少数派どころか、無名化、無力化することが基礎的条件になる。彼らは、この土壌を形成している。
これらの解決なくして勝利はない。実行する主体が何かは、党籍自体の形式的相違に関わらず、それが掲げる政策と同様に無視できるファクターではない。ここでは、運動の担い手の社会的成分を言っている。主体を一面的に無視する政策連合は、市民連合による民進党のための野党共闘という魅力なき政党の野合と変わりなく、逆に目的に背離するし、国民の支持を得ない。小沢鳩山勢力の顔ぶれも敵と同様に旧態依然としている。運動の担い手たちが例えばいつも同じ小沢ファンクラブであったり、硬直してマンネリ化しており、停滞を打破できないまま言葉の表面を変えただけの批判がなされているだけで、理論も実践も硬直して何も進歩がない。彼らの理論的な不徹底性、矛盾、ジグザグや批判の回避、臆病さは、彼らの現実の利害関係のしがらみから来ている。
鳩山由紀夫は、戦後米帝の反共政策で難を逃れた戦犯の家系であり、安倍と違いはない。しかも、対米独立とは異なり、実際は対米隷属の帝国主義政策を推進したブッシュ家との経済的なつながりが強い。なんと、大本営の朝日新聞によるとブッシュ家の石油、ガス会社であるホイフーエナジーの名誉会長で同社より顧問料を領収し続けている。
鳩山由紀夫元首相は政界を引退した翌１３年、バミューダに設立され、香港が拠点の石油・ガス会社「ホイフーエナジー」の名誉会長に就任。この人事を掲載した年次報告書などが文書に含まれていた。
取材に対し、鳩山氏は「会社のトップと数年前に出会い、子どもの結婚式にも呼ばれた。その後、名前だけでも連ねてほしいと言われた。実質は何の意味もない。鳩山の名前で信頼を得たいと思ったのでは」と説明。同社は年次報告書をネットで公開しており、副会長にジョージ・Ｗ・ブッシュ元大統領の弟ニール・ブッシュ氏が就いている。
鳩山氏は同社から顧問料を得ているが、金額は明かさなかった。バミューダとの関わりについては「知らない」と話している。
引用元：http://www.asahi.com/articles/ASKC43G2PKC4UUPI001.html?ref=yahoo例えば、2017年9月26日、植草一秀は、小沢一郎が突如小池百合子の希望の党へ合流を表明した際に、リベラルを否定する小池ネオリベ新党への参加を肯定して見せた。ここに、日和見主義の本質がある。
小池国政新党は「オールジャパン」の言葉を掲げたが、オールジャパン平和と共生の運動を念頭に置いたものであると考えられる。
今回の総選挙の最優先課題は、
「安倍やめろ！野党共闘」
を構築して安倍政治を打倒することである。
オールジャパン平和と共生が提唱している、そのための手法は、
「政策を基軸に」、「党派の壁を超えて」、「主権者が主導して」
実現しようとするものだ。
小池氏の新党立ち上げ会見で、最も注目に値することは、
「消費税増税凍結」
と
「原発ゼロ」
を打ち出したことだ。
「安倍やめろ！野党共闘」を
「消費税増税凍結」
「原発ゼロ」
を基軸に「政策連合」を構築することはあり得ない選択肢ではない。
小池国政新党は基本的に「第二自公」であるから、日本の二大政党が自公と第二自公で形成されることは、懸念される「二党独裁体制」に近づくものではある。
この意味で根本的な問題をはらむものではあるが、ものごとを成し遂げるには「多様なプロセス」があり得る。
日和見主義はともかく、希望の党の政策との共通性を利用するのは選択肢である。安倍政権打倒には不可欠の環の一つなのだから。
希望の党に見られるように、野党共闘政党結成の方法を応用したのは、与党補完勢力だった。ここにきて、民進党内の左派が独自に新政党を作る動きがあるが遅すぎた。しかし、民進党の水と油の分離が実現するのは肯定できる。これは確実な前進である。
小沢は、リベラルを標榜する姿勢からネオリベ肯定の反動政党への合議を前原、小池と行っていた。ここに、政策的な信頼性、一貫性はない。選挙当選目的の日和見主義だけである。見事に反対勢力を分断した。市民連合はあくまで与党補完勢力なので、解散する民進党と自由党と希望の党の連合を支持する必要はない。あくまで、彼らは、残りの反対勢力への浸透工作、統制を続けるだけである。朝日新聞は左派ではなく、大本営の一翼である。政権交代だけが目的なら、希望の党に一本化してしまうことが正解である。
あれだけ、ネオリベ反対だった体制内の反対派たちが日和見的にネオリベ政党肯定へ転化しているのは、日本の政治、反対運動の死を意味している。悲しいことにその残りカスは、硬直した成功し得ないこれまでの方法にしがみつくだけである。ここにあるのはもはや完全に信頼性のない代行主義だけである。反対派のアイドルたちは自分こそが民衆の代行をするのだと自惚れている。反対派も官僚的な代行主義で貫かれている。デモは表象であり、ショーであり、もはや民衆運動ではない。
日本においては、政治はマーケティング活動に堕落している。この退廃を進行させたのがシールズ現象である。
希望の党に自民票と共食いをさせ、立憲民主党、社民、共産党で候補者を一本化して票を掬うという戦術しかない。希望の党の掲げる政策の全否定はあくまで誤りである。最優先は、消費税問題である。
２０１７年の衆院選では、希望の党への日和見的な野党の対応が希望の党の成立自体よりも致命傷になった。有権者の不信、政治的停滞、無関心は依然打破されていない。また、野党共闘が場わたり的に各選挙ごとの当選目的だけで結成されてきた経緯も与党の不意打ちを完全に許してしまっている。評論は総じて事象の追認の域を出ていない。
また、支配階級及び自民公明が制定した小選挙区制など既存の制度枠内での無邪気な解決の試みにも疑問がある。これは、制度変革なくして反対派の永久敗戦が運命付けられていることを無視するのは重大な誤りであることを示す。立憲民主党は、全米民主主義基金のソリダリティーセンターの支配下の連合と取引を行っており、生活保護基準の５％減少という重大な労働者階級への破壊行為を黙認するブルジョア政党であり、この野党第1党も、民進党の政党交付金を盗取することしか考えていない民進党残党と希望の党の野合も日本の現今の政治の大敗減少である。もはや機能していない職業化した政党政治を否定し、直接民主制こそが新しい希望となる制度、主張となる。国会も政府も領土も外国勢力に蹂躙されている日本では、直接民主制こそが有効性を増す。
引用：
衆議院が解散され、１０月２２日の総選挙に向けての激変が始動した。
小池国政新党が「原発ゼロ・消費税増税凍結」の方針を打ち出して情勢が急変した。
この衆院総選挙の最大のテーマは、
「安倍やめろ！」
の是非である。
傍若無人の政治私物化路線をひた走る安倍暴走政権の存続を認めるのか、それともその存続を許さないのか。
総選挙最大の争点はこの部分にある。
この目的を達成するには、呉越同舟戦略もあり得る。
言い方は悪いかもしれないが、
「毒をもって毒を制する」
戦術の採用も考えるべきである。
野党全体で統一候補擁立（数的条件）、労働者階級本位の政策（思想的深度のある質的条件）、そして魅力ある政党（その社会的成分、信頼性及び実現性、つまり行動）というのは実現しておらず、場渡り的な数合わせの形式に流れている。
魅力とは、シールズのような米帝のマスコットを前面に立てることではない。小沢鳩山も大企業の利害を体現している。いつでもネオリベになる。プロレタリア上層までがそこに含まれるが、あくまで上から目線であり、階級的に限界がある。あくまでブルジョアジー内の対立構図にプロレタリアートが追随しているのが日本の構図である。実際自民もかつての民主も国民には同じに見えている。政党の社会的成分自体が広範な大衆から乖離しているのである。野党側のこの階級的成分、社会的成分が何も前回と変わらないで何の違いが期待できるのか？真に徹底した労働者階級の全面的な政党がない。
日本共産党は、ブルジョア政党であり、政権を担わない程度の共産党というCIAの設計した政治の構図を見事に体現している。真にブラック企業と戦っているのは日本の労組と自覚した個人の労働者たちである。
問題は、野党も貫く官僚主義的な代行主義が国民から乖離しすぎていて、利害の代理としてもはや映っていないことである。官僚主義を批判する担い手自身が官僚主義的な代行主義なのである。政党よりも行動的な労組の方が本来の政党の役割を社会的に見事に果たしている。
日本の社会運動の担い手たちは、日本国内に限定された視野での分析や評論に終始しがちであるが、東南アジアも含めた世界的なコンテクストからでないとこのように正体を見破ることはできない。実践と理論の両面ですでに一国の範囲及び視野では到底通用しない。封建主義時代の散発的な一揆の視野をでていない感がある。
日本政府与党と官僚機構は、独自の利害で別の動きをすることにも留意がいる。日本の反体制派運動は明らかに国際組織と結託した官僚機構に操作され統制されている。有力メディアは、体制の為に実際は体制内の反対派のみを大々的に報道し、反体制派運動側の主導権を彼らに握らせ全体としての政局の統制を可能にしている。
2017年10月22日衆院選挙の教訓
オールジャパンの野党共闘は｢永田町の数合わせの論理｣ではない。朝日新聞、読売新聞の野党共闘の試算結果は、野党候補の各選挙区での単純な合算、足し算であり、それで与党を上回るという山口二郎の民進党応援団市民連合の数合わせの野党共闘の論理と同質である。市民連合は、安倍式に強行された安倍版安保法制及びその手続きの違法性にことに反対するのみであり、政策的な具体性がなく、経済政策が全く欠如している。具体的な政策的な同一性に立脚した連立政権を野党共闘で成立させるという方向の努力と、選挙での野合的な数合わせは異なる方向である。政策的同質性への変化を基礎とする政策連合こそ真のレジームチェンジをもたらす。
成果：
１、民進党のネオリベ勢力と民主勢力の分離独立の実現。
２、立憲民主党５４議席で野党第１党になり、自公補完勢力による二大与野党政党独裁体制が阻まれた。
３、野党の実質得票率は与党を超えた。
１、民進党のネオリベ勢力と民主勢力の分離独立の実現。
２、立憲民主党５４議席で野党第１党になり、自公補完勢力による二大与野党政党独裁体制が阻まれた。
３、野党の実質得票率は与党を超えた。
展望：
１、憲法改正は、国民投票の壁がまだ残っている。
２、参院で残存する民進党も敵対勢力間で分離独立が進行する。
３、民進党の支持母体連合でも政策的に敵対する勢力が、野合的な数の論理を打破して分離独立を進める。
４、野党共闘も、市民連合的な野合的数合わせではなく、具体的な政治、経済政策提示、実現に基づく連合政府を目指した路線に、政策連合により修正するべきである。
５、実質得票数を反映しない既存の選挙制度である小選挙区制を廃止すること。得票率では、野党４党（立憲、希望、共産、社民）25.2%は自公の得票率24.6%を超えている。ここに現実がある。
６、日本経済を上場企業株価は反映していない。それは、企業収益の不均衡な拡大だけを表している。日本は経済不況下で特定企業の株価だけが日銀、公的年金資金で吊り上げられている。日本の株価は、日本全体の経済状況ではなく、特定上場企業の収益状況の指標である。さらに、それは円ドルレート、NYダウ、上海総合指数と企業収益の４要因に規定されている。日本経済は今も不況である。
１、憲法改正は、国民投票の壁がまだ残っている。
２、参院で残存する民進党も敵対勢力間で分離独立が進行する。
３、民進党の支持母体連合でも政策的に敵対する勢力が、野合的な数の論理を打破して分離独立を進める。
４、野党共闘も、市民連合的な野合的数合わせではなく、具体的な政治、経済政策提示、実現に基づく連合政府を目指した路線に、政策連合により修正するべきである。
５、実質得票数を反映しない既存の選挙制度である小選挙区制を廃止すること。得票率では、野党４党（立憲、希望、共産、社民）25.2%は自公の得票率24.6%を超えている。ここに現実がある。
６、日本経済を上場企業株価は反映していない。それは、企業収益の不均衡な拡大だけを表している。日本は経済不況下で特定企業の株価だけが日銀、公的年金資金で吊り上げられている。日本の株価は、日本全体の経済状況ではなく、特定上場企業の収益状況の指標である。さらに、それは円ドルレート、NYダウ、上海総合指数と企業収益の４要因に規定されている。日本経済は今も不況である。
結論：今回の敗北は、｢永田町の数合わせの論理｣による野党共闘及びその支援がどれも具体的な政治、経済政策の同一性による政策連合ではなく、したがって連合政府への道及び全面的な野党共闘への道を阻むものであることを証明した。
Analyzing Report:
Japan’s SEALDs which now called ReDEMOS, Public 4 Future is a NED-funded Fake Grass Roots Movement. However, its function especially differs from others due to the Japanese specific political situation that there is mostly manipulated political establishment by US. They just only needs fully control of dissidents via infiltrators, such as SEALDs. NED is an organization that funded and guided by State Department to disturb and manipulate targeted countries or regions by organising and funding mainly NGOs to conduct its mass operations(so called projects). NED functions as a kind of subsidiary of CIA. Japan's NED is JICA. And Japanese dissidents should realise that 'Shiminrengou', 'SEALDs=ReDEMOS=Public 4 Future' are supporting Minshinto while they are backed and marketed by JCP. JCP is not functioning as a 'leftist.' It is just a role of 'leftist' that do not even govern Japan. And their goal is neoliberalism.
See William Blum's Source:http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/TrojanHorse_RS.html
Also see the continuous of SEALDs, Public 4 Future URL:http://public4future.official.jp
事実関係：いわゆるこのオトポール Otpor!に象徴される、アジア金融危機の黒幕ソロスSoros財団とNEDによるカラー革命全般、民主化として喧伝されているアラブの春、台湾ひまわり運動、香港傘革命、ベトナム／フィリピンのベトタン、VOICE 、チベットのSFT反中運動などが、全米民主主義基金NED（National Endowment for Democracy）に、資金援助されその人工芝運動と現地の政権転覆を目指して不安定化を図り実施してきたことは大方周知の事実である。
Facts: As a matter of fact, Color Revolution, Arab Spring, Taiwan Sunflower Movement, Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution, Vietnam and Philippine Anti-China Movement VOICE, SFT (Students for a Free Tibet) are funded by NED.
2016年4月上旬（4月7日、8日）から中旬にフィリピンのマニラで全米民主主義基金NED（National Endowment for Democracy）が支援する東アジアのこれらの人工芝運動の代表達が初めて集い、活動報告を行い、未来の国際的な合作とネットワーク化に合意した。
NED funded fake grass roots group leaders gathered together in Manila in Philippine in April 2016. At the first conference, they did not only reporting their activities for each other, then they also reached an agreement to establish international network for their future complexed international operations. That network calledNOYDA. However, Japanese media are not reported, and Manila News did not mention that name in April 2016.
評価：全米民主主義基金NED（National Endowment for Democracy）の支援するこれらの人工芝運動団体の組織と迎合、協調する組織も、彼らと合作する個人、組織も全体として全米民主主義基金NED（National Endowment for Democracy）の勢力を自覚無自覚に関わりなく構成する。
Calculation: In general, all units, groups and organizations that follow them, connect with them, cooperate with them are part of NED groups and its schemes.
Article about the Manila Gathering: http://www.manila-shimbun.com/category/politics/news222633.html
この会合の表向きの主催者団体は、ベトナムに拠点を持ち、全米民主主義基金NED（National Endowment for Democracy）にファンドされて反政府、反中活動を行っているVOICEというNGOである。しかも、VOICEは同じく全米民主主義基金NEDにファンドされて反政府テロに従事しているViettanと関連した組織である。それは、しかもフィリピンに支部を持っており、フィリピンの反中でもお馴染みである。TPPを推進しているのもベトタンである。ネオリベが本質。
On the surface, the organizer of the Manila Gathering was NED-funded NGO, VOICE. It is basically a Vietnamese political organization for anti-government and anti-China movement, but it also has a branch in Philippine. Furthermore, VOICE is seemed to be a branch of the anti-government terrorist group Viettan that also funded by NED.
Viettanは、２０１４年のベトナム反中運動（騒擾）も仕掛けたし、ベトナム、フィリピンに限らず全世界的に活動する米製反政府テロ組織である。
Viettan is known as Vietnamese notorious anti-China Movement in both Vietnam and Philippine in 2014, also it is a well established anti-gorvernment terrorist group that funded by US and located all over the world.
Easy References:
1) https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ベトナム革新党 (Viettan)
3) http://www.news24.jp/articles/2014/05/17/10251302.html
注：フィリピン反中デモもこのベトナム人学生テロ団体による人工芝運動だった。ただし、この団体だけがフィリピンに存在するわけではない。
注：フィリピン反中デモもこのベトナム人学生テロ団体による人工芝運動だった。ただし、この団体だけがフィリピンに存在するわけではない。
Students for a Free Tibet(SFT)
マニラ会合の参加者Tenzin Tselhaの団体の一つであるStudents for a Free Tibet(SFT)は、１９９４年にニューヨークで設立され、NEDにファンドされた反中民間組織である。
The notorious NED -funded-Anti China Group in Tibet, SFT and its member Tenzin Tselha also attended the Manila Gathering. SFT was founded in 1994 in NewYork, and it's funded by NED.
URL: http://www.ned.org/region/asia/china-tibet-2014/
Students for a Free Tibet(SFT)
マニラ会合の参加者Tenzin Tselhaの団体の一つであるStudents for a Free Tibet(SFT)は、１９９４年にニューヨークで設立され、NEDにファンドされた反中民間組織である。
ひまわり運動からのマニラ会合の参加者林飛帆のフェイスブック投稿（4月09日）からSFTの参加の事実が判明した。
One of the attendees, Feifan Lin from Sunflower Movement mentioned his attendance during the meeting via his Facebook post.
林飛帆：前兩天，和曾柏瑜一起去菲律賓馬尼拉參加兩天的會議，與香港學聯前前秘書長周永康、前秘書長羅冠聰、日本反安保法運動組織SEALDs的奧田愛基、Chiharu Takano、來自印度達蘭薩拉的自由圖博學聯Tenzin Tselha，還有來自菲律賓、韓國及東（南）亞等其他多個國家的青年行動者碰面、交流。由於許多國家目前為止都還在威權政黨或軍政府控制，也有持續搜捕政治犯的問題，不方便公開他們的組織和姓名。
FB:
Other NED funded Tibet organizations include the Students for a Free Tibet (SFT) referred to earlier. The SFT was founded in 1994 in New York City “as a project of US Tibet Committee and the NED-financed International Campaign for Tibet (ICT). The SFT is most known for unfurling a 450 foot banner atop the Great Wall in China; calling for a free Tibet.” (F. William Engdahl, Risky Geopolitical Game: Washington Plays ‘Tibet Roulette’ with China, Global Research, April 2008).
URL:
Note: Both Tibet NGOs above are funded by NED.
NOYDA's NED-funded member groups also including Tibet and Taiwan pro-independent, anti-ChinaNGOs and their internal networks below:
DHARAMSHALA: The Human Rights Network for Tibet and Taiwan, a coalition of various human rights NGOs based in Taiwan, held its first press conference at Lhakpa Tsering hall today to announce its collaboration with the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile through institution of All Party Parliamentary Group for Tibet in the Taiwan Parliament and various startup projects with Tibetan settlement offices in India.
Human Rights Network for Tibet and Taiwan (HRNTT) is a coalition comprising Taiwan-based NGOs with diverse human rights concerns. Its members include Tibetan and Taiwanese social activists, college professors, writers, students and legislators, who have been a long-time supporters of the Tibetan cause. A total of 11 members were present at the press conference, including two legislators: Tshiong-tso Lim, Legislator and founding leader of New Power Party and Kolas Yotaka, Legislator of Democratic Progressive Party in Taiwan.
NOYDA's major role is located in Hong Kong. And it was established its networks in 2016 but it does not actively disclose the Japanese members since disclosure of its scheme in 2016. However the Japanese members actually signed for NOYDA in October 2016. The leader's recent incidents and activities are below:
Comment:You see Human Rights Watch (US NGO) located in Japan held the NED network conference in Kyoto, Japan in May, 2017. In Japan, JICA and Human Rights Watch function as NED.
In NED chairman Garshman claimed NED supports HUMAN RIGHTS in China. HUMAN RIGHTS are funded by NED.
In his testimony of March 13,1997, before the House Sub-committee on International Operations and Human Rights, Mr. Gershman said:
"There has been a doubling of resources spent in Asia (primarily China, Burma and Cambodia) and a tripling of resources for the Middle East. There were also dramatic increases in Central Asia and the former Yugoslavia…
While the discretionary programs and those of our affiliated labour institute support the activities of various pro-democracy networks, among them Human Rights in China, the China Strategic Institute, the Laogai Research Foundation, and the Hong Kong based activities of labour activist Han Dongfang, IRI and CIPE have targeted opportunities created by the official reform policy in the areas of local elections and economic modernization.
Additional grants support the democracy movements in Hong Kong and Tibet and, through the International Forum, we have highlighted the role of Taiwan as an Asian model of successful democratisation."
NED Manila Conference 2016
DHARAMSHALA: The Human Rights Network for Tibet and Taiwan, a coalition of various human rights NGOs based in Taiwan, held its first press conference at Lhakpa Tsering hall today to announce its collaboration with the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile through institution of All Party Parliamentary Group for Tibet in the Taiwan Parliament and various startup projects with Tibetan settlement offices in India.
Human Rights Network for Tibet and Taiwan (HRNTT) is a coalition comprising Taiwan-based NGOs with diverse human rights concerns. Its members include Tibetan and Taiwanese social activists, college professors, writers, students and legislators, who have been a long-time supporters of the Tibetan cause. A total of 11 members were present at the press conference, including two legislators: Tshiong-tso Lim, Legislator and founding leader of New Power Party and Kolas Yotaka, Legislator of Democratic Progressive Party in Taiwan.
NOYDA's major role is located in Hong Kong. And it was established its networks in 2016 but it does not actively disclose the Japanese members since disclosure of its scheme in 2016. However the Japanese members actually signed for NOYDA in October 2016. The leader's recent incidents and activities are below:
Comment:You see Human Rights Watch (US NGO) located in Japan held the NED network conference in Kyoto, Japan in May, 2017. In Japan, JICA and Human Rights Watch function as NED.
In NED chairman Garshman claimed NED supports HUMAN RIGHTS in China. HUMAN RIGHTS are funded by NED.
In his testimony of March 13,1997, before the House Sub-committee on International Operations and Human Rights, Mr. Gershman said:
"There has been a doubling of resources spent in Asia (primarily China, Burma and Cambodia) and a tripling of resources for the Middle East. There were also dramatic increases in Central Asia and the former Yugoslavia…While the discretionary programs and those of our affiliated labour institute support the activities of various pro-democracy networks, among them Human Rights in China, the China Strategic Institute, the Laogai Research Foundation, and the Hong Kong based activities of labour activist Han Dongfang, IRI and CIPE have targeted opportunities created by the official reform policy in the areas of local elections and economic modernization.
Additional grants support the democracy movements in Hong Kong and Tibet and, through the International Forum, we have highlighted the role of Taiwan as an Asian model of successful democratisation."
記事(News Article)：
アジアの民主主義や民主化運動の状況を話し合う若者団体の初会議が、このほど
首都圏マカティ市内のホテルで３日間にわたって開かれた。
The first conference of young political groups in which they discussed about Asian democracy and situations of democratization was held in the capital city Manila for three days.
会議には日本、フィリピンなど10カ国・地域の代表が参加。アジアの民主主義発展で
協力を確認するとともに、ネットワークを形成することで一致した。
Representatives from countries like Japan, Philippine and more than ten countries or regions attended the meeting. Then, they agreed unanimously that they will cooperate and establish network for development of Asian democracy.
会議には日本から安保法制反対の国会前デモなどで知られるＳＥＡＬＤｓ（自由と民主主義のための学生緊急行動）の奥田愛基さん(23)と高野千春さん(22)が参加。
Japanese representatives were Aki Okuda(23) and Chiharu Takano(22) whose organization, SEALDs known for anti-national security law and Demonstration at the front of Parliament(Diet).
台湾からは、２０１４年３月、中国と台湾間のサービス貿易協定の強行採決に反対し、立法院を占拠した「ひまわり学生運動」の学生リーダー２人が加わった。
Taiwanese representatives were two student leaders of Sunflower movement that occupied their parliament for disagreeing with forcible decision on Service Trade Agreement between China and Taiwan.
香港からは、同年９月に民主主義と公平な選挙を求めて香港中心部を占拠した「香港雨傘運動」の前秘書長ら２人が駆けつけ、東南アジアではフィリピンやベトナム、ミャンマー（旧ビルマ）が参加。自国の状況から身の安全のため参加を公表できない民主活動家も集った。
Hong Kong representatives were two ex-chiefs of secretary of Umbrella Revolution that occupied Central Hong Kong for pursuing democracy and fair election. And others were from Philippine, Vietnam and Myanmar. Besides these, there were some democratic activists who could not disclose their attendance for safe consideration under their domestic situations.
会議ではそれぞれの国や地域における民主主義の現状と将来について協議、異なる状況の中でも情報交換しながら互いの活動の長所を学び協力することで合意した。
During the conference, they mentioned the present situation and future of their own countries or regions, and they agreed exchanging information of each other and co-operations by learning each advantages.
初会合は比とベトナムが中心となった非政府組織（ＮＧＯ）ＶＯＩＣＥが主催したため比で開催。今後は年に１回の継続的な開催や、参加団体の共同声明発表なども予定している。
The first conference was held in Philippine due to the NGO, VOICE which operates between Philippine and Vietnam. And they plan organizing annual conference and publishing joint statement.
会議後、マニラ新聞の取材に応じた奥田さんと高野さんによると、ＳＥＡＬＤｓの活動報告に対し、各国代表はラップでのコールやポップカルチャーを取り入れたデモのスタイルを「斬新」と称賛した。
After the meeting, Mr.Okuda and Ms.Takano told Manila News that other representatives applauded their speaking choir in rap music style and pop cultured demonstration as ‘innovative’.
また参加者から「日本はアジアの中で最も民主主義が進んだ国」という認識を聞かされ戸惑ったという。
Moreover, they said that they were astonished when others said: Japan is progressively the most democratic country in Asia.
奥田さんは会議に参加した各国の状況は大きく違い、目標とする民主主義の形も違うが「努力しないとそれをつかめないということを忘れてはならない」と述べ、引き続き安保法制の運用を監視していく姿勢を示した。
Mr.Okuda commented that the situations of every countries are different, and their aimed form of democracy differs from each other. However, he also said: Don’t forget that we can achive that goal as long as we keep fighting. He stated they will keep observing the practice of the national security law.
（冨田すみれ子）Sumireko Tomita reported.
この記事を書き、写真撮影をした冨田すみれ子は、SEALDsの関係者である。
The reporter of the article was Sumireko Tomita who has a close relationship with SEALDs.
そして、それ以上に問題なのが、まにら新聞の正体であり、
まにら新聞が所属する海外日系新聞放送協会は、JICA内に位置する機関である。
And more serious matter is that the truth of the Manila Shinbun.
Manilla Shinbun is a member of The Association of Nikkei and Japanese Abroad. Then, The Association of Nikkei and Japanese Abroad belongs to JICA (a.k.a. Japanese International Cooperation Agency). JICA has been in cooperation with NED for long years. See the Symposium that they held with each other.Their aim is so called Democratization. Ofcourse, it means in its true meaning that it is political destabilization of targeted countries or regions.
そして、国際協力事業団JICAは、全米民主主義基金と協力し、いわゆる民主化工作（対米隷属化のネオリベ浸透工作）に従事してきたことが、彼らの過去のシンポジュームの議事録からも明らかである。
See the Record:http://jica-ri.jica.go.jp/IFIC_and_JBICI-Studies/jica-ri/publication/archives/jica/seminar/pdf/2001_01.pdf
全米民主主義基金NEDのパートナーであるJICA国際協力事業団について
JICAは、ミャンマー選挙への工作に従事するにおいて、JICA米国代表Keiichiro NakazawaがUSAID, NEDとの協議も2012年6月20日に行ったり（いわゆる現地の民主化に関する中澤レポート参照）、国際シンポジウム「開発途上国における民主的機構への支援・強化のために」 を2000年12月6日、7日にJICA 主催、外務省後援、全米民主主義財団(National Endowment for Democracy:NED)協賛のもとに国際協力総合研修所にて開催した。同地のサフラン革命(Saffron Revolution)もカラー革命であり、NED支援化にあるアウンサンスーチーも米帝の傀儡である。ミャンマー軍政は、ミャンマーをこのようなネオリベ浸透から護衛する非常手段である。チベットのダライラマにしてもNED支援化にある。真に民主主義を体現していない米製アイドルたちが日本では民主主義の英雄として反中包囲網の目的で喧伝されている。
そこでは、他国の民主化を促す選挙工作における政府開発援助(ODA) とNGOを介するNEDとの連携体制が日本政府との間で確認されている。基調講演 「国際的な民主化支援の価値」で、2005年にブッシュJr.によって設立された国連民主主義基金(UNDEF)事務局長 Roland Richは、日本による他国の民主化工作への関与を証言している。
In the keynote lecture ‘Values of International Democratization Support,’ the UNDEF chief officer Roland Rich mentioned Japan’s commitment for other countries’ democratization.
日本にはまだ民主主義を専門とする機関は生まれておりません。だ からといって日本が民主化支援に関わっていな いとは言えません。他の形で、例えば、UNDP や 国連民主主義基金といった多国間機関、あるいは インターナショナル IDEA といった国際的機関、 さらには二国間の形でも日本は貢献しています。
-Roland Rich
Roland Rich depicts that there is still no organization in charge of democratisation in Japan. However, Japan has been in cooperating with multinational organizations UNDP, UNDEF, or international organization IDEA, furthermore, Japan adapts mutual cooperation between two countries for supporting democratisation abroad.
日本政府、 外務省から、国連民主主義基金へ資金援助され、それが全米民主主義基金との連携で、さらに各国の非政府組織と政党への選挙、組織支援へと資金がマネーロンダリング（資金洗浄）される国際的にも比較的高額な支援体制となっていることが分かる。また、ここには日本の市民、市民団体から直接に国連民主主義基金のプロジェクトへの賛助という逆方向からのラインも存在している点を無視できない。全ては、海外支援や民主化という大義名分のもとに今も行われているし、日本もそのパートナーなのであり、共犯と言える。
About JICA, the partner of NED in Japan:
Japanese government, ministry of foreign affairs with ODA to UNDEF, then, what we can see is cooperation with NED and its NGOs in each country to introduce its financial support which based on money laundering network internationally. And Japan is the largest financial supporter for their democratization that is part of NED=CIA de-stabilization of other countries’ political development.
Besides, there is financial support from the opposite side that Japan’s citizen and citizen groups directly apply for UNDEF democratization projects. All of them are made under the bright name and cover of international support or democratization.
UNDEF、国連民主主義基金は、人権を提唱する 民主主義機関として市民や市民集団の参画を募 っています。私たちは、国連から予算を計上して もらう組織ではありません。2007 年、120 のプロ ジェクトが第一弾としてサポートされました。今 回 1800 の申請が世界からございました。中には 日本からもありました。残念ながら、ファンディ ングできるのはその中の75件くらいのプロジェ クトなのです。この 1800 からいかに 75 に絞り込 むか。これはわたくしどもがいま現在やっている 仕事で、実は大変な力を要するものです。日本は ファンディングの面でインドと並ぶ大変大きな 貢献国です。
-Roland Rich
Roland Rich also testified that UNDEF is recruiting human rights/democracy-oriented citizen and citizen groups from all over the world because they’re not funded by UN itself.
For instance, in 2007, their 120 projects were supported. And there were total 1800 applications. It including Japan. However, not all of them could get into the projects from out side of UN-US establishment. UNDEF could only select 75 out of 1800 applicants for projects they planed.
And the most important fact is that Japan and India are the largest financial supporters of UNDEF-NED driven democratization of other countries.
Reference:
URL:
www.jica.go.jp/usa/english/office/topics/pdf/topics_12062...(Nakazawa Report)
Analysis:
Japan’s SEALDs (ReDEMOS, Public 4 Future)is a NED-funded Fake Grass Roots Movement. NED is an organization that funded and guided by State Department to disturb and manipulate targeted countries or regions by organising and funding NGOs to conduct its mass operations(projects). Besides this, JICA is one of key partners of NED in Japan.
JICA mainly engaged so called Democratization of Myanmar in tight corporation with USAID and NED. And their US chief Kenichiro Nakazawa, NED and USAID held a meeting in June 20, 2012. (read the report on the 'democratisation')
Furthermore, Japanese Government (Ministry of Foreign Affairs), JICA, NGO, NED confirmed their cooperation in so called 'democratisation' of other countries during the international discussion 'For Support and Intensification of Democratic Entity in Developing Country.' It proved that ODA(Official Development Assistance) is in the use for 'democratisation.'
Additionally, we found NED and JICA supported Aung San Suu Kyi as a US puppet to overthrow Myanmarese military regime which protecting Myanmar from imperialist schemes.
The trans-border activities of the NED against the Myanmarese military regime seem to be directed mainly from Thailand and India. And the Democratic Voice of America is typical propaganda medium which manipulated by NED imperialists.
This is evident from a testimony given by Ms. Louisa Coan, NED’s Program Officer for Asia, before the House Sub-committee on Asia and the Pacific on September 17,1997.
She said:
"NED has been able through its direct grants program to support the dissidents, to support the democracy movement of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, particularly through assistance to the groups along the borders in Thailand and in India, including twice daily radio programming through the Democratic Voice of Burma (author’s comment: based in Scandinavia), newsletters, underground newspaper, underground labour organizing, particular programs to foster inter-ethnic co-operation and unity among the opposition forces in support of Aung San Suu Kyi’s call for tripartite dialogue and national reconciliation."
-Roland Rich
-Roland Rich
Furthermore, Japanese Government (Ministry of Foreign Affairs), JICA, NGO, NED confirmed their cooperation in so called 'democratisation' of other countries during the international discussion 'For Support and Intensification of Democratic Entity in Developing Country.' It proved that ODA(Official Development Assistance) is in the use for 'democratisation.'
Additionally, we found NED and JICA supported Aung San Suu Kyi as a US puppet to overthrow Myanmarese military regime which protecting Myanmar from imperialist schemes.
The trans-border activities of the NED against the Myanmarese military regime seem to be directed mainly from Thailand and India. And the Democratic Voice of America is typical propaganda medium which manipulated by NED imperialists.
This is evident from a testimony given by Ms. Louisa Coan, NED’s Program Officer for Asia, before the House Sub-committee on Asia and the Pacific on September 17,1997.
She said:
She said:
"NED has been able through its direct grants program to support the dissidents, to support the democracy movement of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, particularly through assistance to the groups along the borders in Thailand and in India, including twice daily radio programming through the Democratic Voice of Burma (author’s comment: based in Scandinavia), newsletters, underground newspaper, underground labour organizing, particular programs to foster inter-ethnic co-operation and unity among the opposition forces in support of Aung San Suu Kyi’s call for tripartite dialogue and national reconciliation."
つまり、日本においては、外務省国際協力事業団JICAは全米民主主義基金の関連団体であり、それに属する海外日系新聞放送協会とその会員であるまにら新聞は全米民主主義基金の影響下にある団体である。そこが、排他的に報じているということも全米民主主義基金との関係の証左である。官僚機構が独自の利権集団、主体として米国の他国の政権転覆工作である新自由主義化に、民主化の美名において手を貸している実態がある。
In sum, JICA is one of key partners of NED in Japan.
JICA owns The Association of Nikkei and Japanese Abroad and its member Manila Shinbun which exclusively reported the news of the Manila Gathering. Moreover, JICA is run by Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Japanese government supports NED imperialism in Asia.
Proof of NED manipulation and involvement in Japanese political disturbances is the following photo. NED was actually cerebrating their fake grass roots spreading in Japan. Why did NED retweet and comment on the SEALDs protest?
See the below:
Additional info.
1) One of the intellectual supporters of SEALDs is Tatsuya Yoshioka who is a representative of Peace Boat, and who is also a commissioner of ADN which funded by NED. Peace Boat is one of relative organisations of NED and SEALDs.
2) Lawyer of SEALDs Kazuko Ito and her organization Human-rights-now has a tight relationship with the NED-related Peace Boat.
In sum, JICA is one of key partners of NED in Japan.
JICA owns The Association of Nikkei and Japanese Abroad and its member Manila Shinbun which exclusively reported the news of the Manila Gathering. Moreover, JICA is run by Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Japanese government supports NED imperialism in Asia.
Proof of NED manipulation and involvement in Japanese political disturbances is the following photo. NED was actually cerebrating their fake grass roots spreading in Japan. Why did NED retweet and comment on the SEALDs protest?
See the below:
Additional info.
1) One of the intellectual supporters of SEALDs is Tatsuya Yoshioka who is a representative of Peace Boat, and who is also a commissioner of ADN which funded by NED. Peace Boat is one of relative organisations of NED and SEALDs.
2) Lawyer of SEALDs Kazuko Ito and her organization Human-rights-now has a tight relationship with the NED-related Peace Boat.
3) On July 30, 2017, Joshua Wong publicly claimed that Asian Democratic Youth Net Work consists of eight countries' grass root movement leaders and expand its networks. Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution, Japan's SEALDs(ReDEMOS=Public 4 Future), Vietnam/ Philippines' Việt Tân, VOICE, South Korea's ADN, Malaysia's Bersih, Thailand's NDM(New Democracy Movement) and Tibet's SFT etc.. Total 8 nation alliance. It aims at Anti-China, and its monopoly of Asian Countries by US imperialist regimes. We can call it US Colour Revolutions' 8 Nation Alliance (美帝顏色革命的八國聯軍). Don't forget that it at least 10 countries and regions of Asia excluding July 23-24, 2017 Miura-shi, Kanagawa-ken, Japan held NED conference (the topic is 'Democratization' of China) which had 50 Western and Asian countries' representatives of this kind attended. This political conference was organized by 中國民主論壇（其主席為秦晉）. NED funded Federation for a Democratic China(中國民主陣線), NED branch of Taiwan Foundation for Democracy(台灣民主基金會) and NED funded Umbrella Revolution organizers, Tai Benny(戴耀廷), Pro-Hong Kong Independence from China, and Youngspiration（青年新政）leaders, such as Sixtus Leung Chung-hang（梁頌恆), Yau Wai-ching（遊慧禎).
This 2017 Japan conference claimed that Japan and Taiwan are going to be their major international bases for 'democratising' China geographically. It links NOYDA. And it is part of entire Anti-China Colour Revolution network. However, India is also a big corroborator for this anti-China scheme.
About the Japan conference of NED funded anti China groups. See more at the below link.
Asahi News (Asahi Shinbun) is one of NED propaganda machines. Their August 24, 2016 article '' What SEALDs Left to Us #6: Party or Citizen? Discussion by the Young'' hides the existence of Manila Shinbun that run by JICA, Japanese government. They just created the episode In January 2016, Joshua invited Okuda and Takano of SEALDs to attend the NED Manila Gathering, NOYDA's founded at this meeting. Asahi Shinbun avoids the true political context from the public. And it proved that they are not true opposition to imperialists but they are one of them. This major medium is also to serve imperialism to deceive Japanese citizens from left wing.
This is not this kind of individual friend meeting at Manila, but its is a organisational business meeting to conduct more imperialist fake democracy disturbances in the regions. See SEALDs members attend ADN meeting now in Korea. And Okuda and Takano are organisationally replaced by Muranaka and Motoyama etc. Why Asahi did not disclose these facts?
Source:http://www.asahi.com/articles/DA3S12525304.html
URL: 人権弾圧にＮＯ！ 「中国への経済援助は中国共産党を支援していること」「日本は対中政策を再検討せよ」
The 'democratisation' means neo-liberalist hell you can see in Chile after the 9.11 , 1973. See more about the classical US imperialist colour revolution, 1973 Chilean coup d'état. The good news is that these agitators of Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution have been gradually sentenced but it is not reasonably acceptable due to its lightness contrary to colonial era. ''The legacy of colonialism'' such as prestigious class of past colonial era still does exist in Hong Kong, moreover they have been part of anti-China conspiracies of today since notorious 'Operation Yellow Bird' that organisational network and its escape plan for agitators of 1989 Tiananmen square Colour Revolution in Beijing, China. See more about CIA and Colonial UKHK's Tiananmen square colour revolution network by knowing 'operation yellow bird'.
天安門事件はカラー革命だった！虐殺事件は偽造！
天安門事件もCIA, MI6, 香港植民地政府主体のオペレーションイエローバードに顕現される反中組織網によるカラー革命であることは、日本では隠蔽されている。この作戦は、脱出作戦であるが、実行と脱出作戦はセットで考案されるのがプロであり、ここに浮かび上がる組織網こそがその事件を実行する際の組織網である点は隠蔽できない。戦後、米国帝国主義が世界５０か国で民選の現地の政権を民主の名において違法な手段で転覆し、米国多国籍企業に市場を寡占させて現地の生活産業を蹂躙してきた対米従属化の歴史こそが真の歴史のコンテクストである。真の民主とは、何かをこの歴史から読み取るべきである。
URL:https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/黃雀行動
6.4.Tiananmen Square Massacre (1989) was a Lie! Wiki Leaks Proved it!
日本では天安門事件で虐殺があったなどと虚偽報道がされてきたが、そのような虐殺は起きていないことがウィキリークスにより判明している。正体は、反中カラー革命であり、他国を民主化の偽善的粉飾のもとに強奪する帝国主義の暴挙である。ちなみに、広場以外での虐殺を証明する内容ではない。この天安門広場の虐殺事件及びそれを支持するニカラグア、キューバ、ベトナム政府という構図はCIAをはじめとする諜報機関の統制下にある主流メディアが流した虚偽報道であることは今日では知られている。
1989: After the infamous Chinese crackdown on dissenters in Tiananmen Square in June, the US news media was replete with reports that the governments of Nicaragua, Vietnam and Cuba had expressed their support of the Chinese leadership. Said the Wall Street Journal: “Nicaragua, with Cuba and Vietnam, constituted the only countries in the world to approve the Chinese Communists’ slaughter of the students in Tiananmen Square.” But it was all someone’s fabrication; no such support had been expressed by any of the three governments. At that time, as now, there were few, if any, organizations other than the CIA which could manipulate major Western media in such a manner.
See
Chinese Colour Revolution Network: 劉曉波 Liu Xiaobo - 獨立筆會 ICPC - 美國民主基金會 NED
Summary
During a recent meeting, a latin
american diplomat and his wife provided poloff an
account of their movements on june 3-4 and their
eyewitness account of events at tiananmen square.
Although their account generally follows those
previously reported, their unique experiences provide
additional insight and corroboration of events in the
square. They were able to enter and leave the square
several times and were not harassed by troops.
Remaining with students by the monument to the
people's heroes until the final withdrawal, the
diplomat said there were no mass shootings of
students in the square or at the monument.
End summary.
Only one forth of 2014 anti-China Colour Revolutionaries (Criminals) were prosecuted by HK law authority... Independence of law system is doubted by nationalists because this laziness, cowardliness, lawlessness of HK authority to not prosecute the all leaders and patrons of the Occupy Central movements (Anti-China Colour Revolution). In fact, colonial prestigious ruling class still exist and controls law authorities to delay and prevent normal and strict practice of law forcemeat on them.
This is the true threat to the independence of Hong Kong law system.
Brief Knowledge about post 2014 political situation of HK:http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20170801/00176_003.html
''黃之鋒預告，壯大「亞洲民主青年網絡」，連結八國青年抗爭領袖，又會進行國會游說和參與聽證等等。'' 那些領袖們都基本上進不了香港了。
Photo: DQ ex-senator
2. 林飛帆 Lin Fei-Fan - Taiwan Sunflower Movement (Taiwan) was backed by NED, USAID, 台灣民主基金會(Democratic Foundation of Taiwan)及其初任董事長兼幕後黑手王金平. 美帝資助台灣獨立的國際組織之一是Formosa Association for Public Affairs (FAPA)。Formosa Association for Public Affaires has tight connection with USAID. And they invited leaders of Taiwan Sunflower Movement just after the end of occupation of the parliament on April 9 and 10th., 2014. Moreover, they had several meetings with NED at Washington. Scheduled their series of events during the movement.
7. 정수연 (a.k.a. Jung Soo Youn) - ADN (South Korea) NED funded ! Asian Colour Revolutionary Agitators' Regional HQ!
8. Raxiey Adolfo - Human Rights (Philippines) NED funded!
NOYDAの日本メンバーはもちろんSEALDs
他們所謂反安倍是假反安倍！國際上屬於反中包圍網！意在日本國內的反對派內掌握主導權來掌控整個反體制運動！在野黨統戰連敗的主因在此！
ADN and its Organisations
Malaysia's Bersih is NED funded Fake Grass Roots Movement that combined with 25-62 NGOs and 5 political parties in Malaysia. On Bersih 2.0 rally, ADN's organisations were listed below:
These groups are 'Pro-Independence / Pro-Democracy' Movements but in its nature, they are Pro-Neoliberalism. They aimed at establishing puppet regimes for US imperialism and its multi-national corporations. Destabilisation, pro-independence, pro-democracy are just political methods for the scheme. For example, Xinjiang 'Uyghur American Association' is funded by NED. It seems that it just aimed at pro-Xinjiang independence but it is like other colour revolutions, the final target is to get rid of national regime and replace it by US puppet regime.
簡言之，顏色革命是否採取獨立運動的形式，那取決於不同國情。如中國，港獨，台獨，疆獨，藏獨都是最終建立美帝在中國的傀儡政權之諸環節以及手段。獨立不是純粹的最終目的！
See more about Xinjiang 'Pro-Independence' Colour Revolution Scheme
Comment:
Fact: NED funds ADN regularly every year. See the below,
NED is establishing anti-China networks that actually surrounding China and other parts of Asia. VOICE is a threat to China's security benefits. You can't only see Joshua Wong audits HK located NGOs as direct threats. VOICE is also now tightly supported by Taiwan for the next colour revolution targeting China.
Domestic anti-China NGOs in Hong Kong or near China are also cross regional and international organisations which belonging to NED's worldwide colour revolution networks!
This 2017 Japan conference claimed that Japan and Taiwan are going to be their major international bases for 'democratising' China geographically. It links NOYDA. And it is part of entire Anti-China Colour Revolution network. However, India is also a big corroborator for this anti-China scheme.
About the Japan conference of NED funded anti China groups. See more at the below link.
Asahi News (Asahi Shinbun) is one of NED propaganda machines. Their August 24, 2016 article '' What SEALDs Left to Us #6: Party or Citizen? Discussion by the Young'' hides the existence of Manila Shinbun that run by JICA, Japanese government. They just created the episode In January 2016, Joshua invited Okuda and Takano of SEALDs to attend the NED Manila Gathering, NOYDA's founded at this meeting. Asahi Shinbun avoids the true political context from the public. And it proved that they are not true opposition to imperialists but they are one of them. This major medium is also to serve imperialism to deceive Japanese citizens from left wing.
This is not this kind of individual friend meeting at Manila, but its is a organisational business meeting to conduct more imperialist fake democracy disturbances in the regions. See SEALDs members attend ADN meeting now in Korea. And Okuda and Takano are organisationally replaced by Muranaka and Motoyama etc. Why Asahi did not disclose these facts?
Source:http://www.asahi.com/articles/DA3S12525304.html
URL: 人権弾圧にＮＯ！ 「中国への経済援助は中国共産党を支援していること」「日本は対中政策を再検討せよ」
The 'democratisation' means neo-liberalist hell you can see in Chile after the 9.11 , 1973. See more about the classical US imperialist colour revolution, 1973 Chilean coup d'état. The good news is that these agitators of Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution have been gradually sentenced but it is not reasonably acceptable due to its lightness contrary to colonial era. ''The legacy of colonialism'' such as prestigious class of past colonial era still does exist in Hong Kong, moreover they have been part of anti-China conspiracies of today since notorious 'Operation Yellow Bird' that organisational network and its escape plan for agitators of 1989 Tiananmen square Colour Revolution in Beijing, China. See more about CIA and Colonial UKHK's Tiananmen square colour revolution network by knowing 'operation yellow bird'.
天安門事件はカラー革命だった！虐殺事件は偽造！
天安門事件もCIA, MI6, 香港植民地政府主体のオペレーションイエローバードに顕現される反中組織網によるカラー革命であることは、日本では隠蔽されている。この作戦は、脱出作戦であるが、実行と脱出作戦はセットで考案されるのがプロであり、ここに浮かび上がる組織網こそがその事件を実行する際の組織網である点は隠蔽できない。戦後、米国帝国主義が世界５０か国で民選の現地の政権を民主の名において違法な手段で転覆し、米国多国籍企業に市場を寡占させて現地の生活産業を蹂躙してきた対米従属化の歴史こそが真の歴史のコンテクストである。真の民主とは、何かをこの歴史から読み取るべきである。
URL:https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/黃雀行動
6.4.Tiananmen Square Massacre (1989) was a Lie! Wiki Leaks Proved it!
日本では天安門事件で虐殺があったなどと虚偽報道がされてきたが、そのような虐殺は起きていないことがウィキリークスにより判明している。正体は、反中カラー革命であり、他国を民主化の偽善的粉飾のもとに強奪する帝国主義の暴挙である。ちなみに、広場以外での虐殺を証明する内容ではない。この天安門広場の虐殺事件及びそれを支持するニカラグア、キューバ、ベトナム政府という構図はCIAをはじめとする諜報機関の統制下にある主流メディアが流した虚偽報道であることは今日では知られている。
1989: After the infamous Chinese crackdown on dissenters in Tiananmen Square in June, the US news media was replete with reports that the governments of Nicaragua, Vietnam and Cuba had expressed their support of the Chinese leadership. Said the Wall Street Journal: “Nicaragua, with Cuba and Vietnam, constituted the only countries in the world to approve the Chinese Communists’ slaughter of the students in Tiananmen Square.” But it was all someone’s fabrication; no such support had been expressed by any of the three governments. At that time, as now, there were few, if any, organizations other than the CIA which could manipulate major Western media in such a manner.
See
The Anti-Empire Report #153
維基解密了六四天安門屠殺是反中媒體捏造的虛假報導的產物！此反中宣傳的工具是假的！Liu Xiaobo was supported by NEDChinese Colour Revolution Network: 劉曉波 Liu Xiaobo - 獨立筆會 ICPC - 美國民主基金會 NED
(Letter from Charles Liu) 劉曉波與美國民主基金會 (Liu Xioabo and the NED)
Note: If the inserted video has some technical error to view, please visit the video page.
The Video Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwKx02ClIA8
Summary
During a recent meeting, a latin
american diplomat and his wife provided poloff an
account of their movements on june 3-4 and their
eyewitness account of events at tiananmen square.
Although their account generally follows those
previously reported, their unique experiences provide
additional insight and corroboration of events in the
square. They were able to enter and leave the square
several times and were not harassed by troops.
Remaining with students by the monument to the
people's heroes until the final withdrawal, the
diplomat said there were no mass shootings of
students in the square or at the monument.
End summary.
The Latest Political Situation since 2014: Hong Kong is the centre of the NED-funded Anti-China Fake Grass Roots Movements that exploit local dissidents and leftist groups that fooled by their political marketing. The present situation is that among 48 criminal organizers of the Hong Kong colour revolution, there still are 39 organises have not been persecuted yet. The authority has been negligent and affected by colonial prestigious class that preserved their profits after 1997. HongKong people are familiar with their brainwash campaign and blame them that they did not even sent their own children to occupy Central instead of other families' children.
警方數字顯示，違法佔領行動期間拘捕九百五十五人，另有四十八人其後被捕，截至今年七月底，共有二百二十五人已經或正在經司法程序處理，當中一百二十五人須承擔法律後果，包括八十三人被定罪及四十二人須簽保守行為，換言之，被捕近一千人，當中只有約四分一被檢控。事有湊巧，世界經濟論壇最新公布二○一七至一八年度全球競爭力報告，當中被視為香港發展基石的司法獨立排名，由去年第八位跌至十三位，有意見指這反映佔中遺禍，影響外界對香港法治及司法獨立信心。
This is the true threat to the independence of Hong Kong law system.
Brief Knowledge about post 2014 political situation of HK:http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20170801/00176_003.html
美帝媒體大紀元，法輪功與美帝顏色革命組織NED的紐帶 Elliott Abrams 作為帝國主義工具的法輪功
Falun Gong-Epoch Times-NED Elliot Abrams Connection
Summery: Elliot Abrams is NED senior fellow. He is famous for founding NED and several important covert operations for neoconservative stealth imperialism. For example, withholding information from congress on Iran-Contra Affair, engaged in El Salvador's El Mozote Massacre and consultation for Falun Gong and its Epoch Times in New York since 2000. NED's related person is actually a consultant for Falun Gong and its anti-China medium for colour revolution, Epoch Times. Abrams is member, experienced chairman of United States Commission on International Religious Freedom since 1999-2001, 2012-. This is exactly his connection with Falun Gong. Epoch Times was founded during his membership of the commission. Epoch Times is not Chinese medium at all! It is US imperialist medium which aims at anti-China.
NED describes his profile like this:
NED describes his profile like this:
Elliott Abrams is senior fellow for Middle Eastern Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in Washington, D.C. He served as deputy assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser in the administration of President George W. Bush, where he supervised U.S. policy in the Middle East for the White House.
Mr. Abrams was educated at Harvard College, the London School of Economics, and Harvard Law School. After serving on the staffs of Sen. Henry M. Jackson and Daniel P. Moynihan, he was an assistant secretary of state in the Reagan administration and received the secretary of state’s Distinguished Service Award from Secretary George P. Shultz. In 2012, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy gave him its Scholar-Statesman Award.
Mr. Abrams was president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C., from 1996 until joining the White House staff. He was a member of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom from 1999 to 2001 and chairman of the commission in the latter year, and in 2012 was reappointed to membership for another term. Mr. Abrams is also a member of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council, which directs the activities of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. He teaches U.S. foreign policy at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service.
Mr. Abrams was president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C., from 1996 until joining the White House staff. He was a member of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom from 1999 to 2001 and chairman of the commission in the latter year, and in 2012 was reappointed to membership for another term. Mr. Abrams is also a member of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council, which directs the activities of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. He teaches U.S. foreign policy at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service.
Mr. Abrams joined the Bush administration in June 2001 as special assistant to the president and senior director of the NSC for democracy, human rights, and international organizations. From December 2002 to February 2005, he served as special assistant to the president and senior director of the National Security Council for Near East and North African affairs. He served as deputy assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for global democracy strategy from February 2005 to January 2009, and in that capacity supervised both the Near East and North African Affairs and the democracy, human rights, and international organizations directorates of the NSC.
He is the author of four books, Undue Process (1993), Security and Sacrifice (1995),Faith or Fear: How Jews Can Survive in a Christian America (1997), and the recently released Tested by Zion: the Bush Administration and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict(2013); and the editor of three more, Close Calls: Intervention, Terrorism, Missile Defense and “Just War” Today; Honor Among Nations: Intangible Interests and Foreign Policy; and The Influence of Faith: Religion and American Foreign Policy.
Religion is One of Colour Revolution Devices
法輪功及びそのメディアであるエポックタイムズの顧問がイランコントラ事件で悪名高い帝国主義者Elliot Abramsなのである。このように、NED、すなわち国務省と法輪功はキーパーソンを通じてつながっている。２０００年から２０１７年の今日まで健在である。学生、労組だけでなく、宗教もカラー革命の道具である。ここに法輪功が宗教ではなく邪教と言われる所以がある。
See more about Elliot Abrams:http://heavy.com/news/2017/02/elliott-abrams-donald-trump-appointee-deputy-secretary-of-state-bio-israel-who-is-iran-contra-wife/
''黃之鋒預告，壯大「亞洲民主青年網絡」，連結八國青年抗爭領袖，又會進行國會游說和參與聽證等等。'' 那些領袖們都基本上進不了香港了。
Specific 'Safe' Members of NOYDA(You should block them to prevent the stealth imperialism):
1. 羅冠聰 Nathan Law - Umbrella Revolution (Hong Kong) NED=NDI funded!
2. 林飛帆 Lin Fei-Fan - Taiwan Sunflower Movement (Taiwan) was backed by NED, USAID, 台灣民主基金會(Democratic Foundation of Taiwan)及其初任董事長兼幕後黑手王金平. 美帝資助台灣獨立的國際組織之一是Formosa Association for Public Affairs (FAPA)。Formosa Association for Public Affaires has tight connection with USAID. And they invited leaders of Taiwan Sunflower Movement just after the end of occupation of the parliament on April 9 and 10th., 2014. Moreover, they had several meetings with NED at Washington. Scheduled their series of events during the movement.
URL:
1) US funded Taiwan Independence International Network (ICDT)
2) https://www.facebook.com/linfeifan.tw?fref=mentions
1) US funded Taiwan Independence International Network (ICDT)
2) https://www.facebook.com/linfeifan.tw?fref=mentions
3. 曾柏瑜 Poyu-Tseng - Taiwan Sunflower Movement (Taiwan) NED funded!
4. Nghia Trung Trong Nguyen (a.k.a. Effy Nguyen) - VOICE / Việt Tân (Vietnam and Philipines) NED funded!
5. Chow Alex - Umbrella Revolution (Hong Kong) NED=NDI funded! His Chinese name is 周永康.
6. Surin Pattamassanuphong -New Democratic Movement (Thailand) NED funded!
7. 정수연 (a.k.a. Jung Soo Youn) - ADN (South Korea) NED funded ! Asian Colour Revolutionary Agitators' Regional HQ!
8. Raxiey Adolfo - Human Rights (Philippines) NED funded!
For more actual citation is below:
【國際連線 團結抗爭】
我以香港代表身份，參與 #亞洲青年民主網絡（#NOYDA）的聯署，亞洲青年民主網絡在此向泰國政府提出嚴正抗議，泰國政府在沒有任何理由的狀況下，卻違反人身安全及行動自由逕自扣留黃之鋒，亞洲青年民主網絡認為泰國政府此舉已經嚴重違反人權，我們也強烈譴責中國政府對於香港民主運動者的壓迫。
───────
共同簽署｜
共同簽署｜
亞洲青年民主連線秘書處：
曾柏瑜、Francis Chao、Nguyen Trung trong nghia
曾柏瑜、Francis Chao、Nguyen Trung trong nghia
台灣代表：林飛帆
香港代表：羅冠聰、周永康
泰國代表
Siriphorn Chaiphet,Young Leadership for Social Change Program, Thai Volunteer Service Foundation、New democracy movement Thailand、Surin pattamassanuphong, พรรคสามัญชน Commoner Party
Siriphorn Chaiphet,Young Leadership for Social Change Program, Thai Volunteer Service Foundation、New democracy movement Thailand、Surin pattamassanuphong, พรรคสามัญชน Commoner Party
韓國代表：Soo Yon Suh, Asia Democracy Networ Coordinator
菲律賓代表：Raxiey Adolfo, Co-founder and Commissioner on Human Rights, International Youth United (IYU)
越南代表：Mss Sapphire, Vietnamese Oversea Initiative for Conscience Empowerment (VOICE)、Nguyen Thao Chi, Vietnamese Oversea Initiative for Conscience Empowerment (VOICE)
───────
URGENT STATEMENT
URGENT STATEMENT
Solemn protest against Thai government for its detention of Joshua Wong.
By Network of Young Democratic Asians (NOYDA)
The student leader of Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement, Joshua Wong, was invited by student leader from Thailand to give a speech in Chulalongkorn University. However, Joshua Wong was detained by Thai authorities when he arrived Thailand’s Bangkok Suvarnabhumi International Airport at 0:45 yesterday. He had lost contact for more than nine hours. According to Thai student leader Netiwit Chotipatpaisal, the Thai government had received a letter of instruction from the Chinese government to do so.
The Network of Young Democratic Asians presents solemn protest to the Thai government. The Thai government had violated Joshua Wong’s personal security and freedom of movement by detaining him in the absence of any legal reason. The Network of Young Democratic Asians believes that Thai Government's decision is a serious violation of human rights. We strongly condemn the Chinese government's oppression of the democratic movement in Hong Kong as well.
Japanese Members of NOYDA
NOYDAの日本メンバーはもちろんSEALDs
1) Jinshiro Motoyama from SEALDs: He attended 2017 ADN conference to further discuss the next strategy and sustainability of the SEALDs movement with other ADN funded members on May 14-19, in South Korea.
Jinshiro Motoyama's SEALDs Membership
Comment: Jinshiro Motoyama is also from International Christian University in Japan where the leaders of SEALDs graduated and cultivated from. ADN now manipulates Motoyama instead of notorious Aki Okuda who lost strong accountability in leftist side. We also can see other Japanese member of NOYDA.
2) Chihiro Muranaka from SEALDs
He has the same attitude with Jinshiro Motoyama. And he recently met Agnes Chow Ting 周庭 who speaks Japanese for Umbrella colour revolution agitators. It is obvious that failed agent Aki Okuda was replaced by Chihiro Muranaka who is a wanna be the next 'hero' of fake popular uprising.
Source: https://twitter.com/ChiVillain
- Asia Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
- Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
- Asia Development Alliance (ADA)
- Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict (GPPAC) Asia
- Migrant Forum in Asia (MFA)
- International NGO Forum on Indonesian Development (INFID)
- Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)/ Asia Democracy Research Network (ADRN)
- People’s SAARC
- Southeast Asia Committee for Advocacy (SEACA)
See the article:
Malaysia: Chair of Electoral Reform Movement – Bersih 2.0, Maria Chin Should be Released ( Asia Democracy Network (ADN) ]
The Nature of 'Pro-Independence' Colour Revolution Scheme in China Regions
Separatism and Colour Revolution
These groups are 'Pro-Independence / Pro-Democracy' Movements but in its nature, they are Pro-Neoliberalism. They aimed at establishing puppet regimes for US imperialism and its multi-national corporations. Destabilisation, pro-independence, pro-democracy are just political methods for the scheme. For example, Xinjiang 'Uyghur American Association' is funded by NED. It seems that it just aimed at pro-Xinjiang independence but it is like other colour revolutions, the final target is to get rid of national regime and replace it by US puppet regime.
簡言之，顏色革命是否採取獨立運動的形式，那取決於不同國情。如中國，港獨，台獨，疆獨，藏獨都是最終建立美帝在中國的傀儡政權之諸環節以及手段。獨立不是純粹的最終目的！
About Hong Kong Destabilisation which called Umbrella Movement (2014), the great insightful article was written by Land Destroyer. See the article:
See more about Xinjiang 'Pro-Independence' Colour Revolution Scheme
Comment:
You should know the latest colour revolution (Neo Liberalization of Targeted Country for US Imperialism) is not only based on youths, and it is also cross-regional operations, your thought should not be limited in one generation, one country or one region, other wise you will be doomed. Such as NDM is typical example of cross regional colour revolutionary operation that involves both Malaysia and Vietnam at the same time.
Their Asian centre is ADN in South Korea. This is why so many nationalists hate Korea. ADN is in cooperation with Japanese government, such as JICA. Peace Boat also connected ADN to support SEALDs. However, their actors, activities and its connections' expansion have been more limited by authorities who try to prevent US funded colour revolutions and its neo-liberalist hell. Information is the key to destroy their schemes. See the failed Umbrella Revolution. On the contrary, Japan, India and Taiwan are completely manipurated by their bureaucrats and imperialists. And its situation made Japan, India and Taiwan are major contributors of colour revolutions in Asia.
Fact: NED funds ADN regularly every year. See the below,
e.g. In 2016, NED funded Asia Democracy Network (ADN).
Korea Human Rights Foundation
$125,000
About VOICE(Viettan), you can read the article below for further knowledge on the issue.
VOICE is a branch of the US-made Terrorist Group Viettan. VOICE's core members are active in Vietnam, Thailand, Philippine, Malaysia, US and now it found its haven in Taiwan. They mainly engage in anti-China and anti-Vietnamese government. And it cooperates with other NED-funded organisations like NOYDA.
You can see the NED-funded political NGOs, politically established company, independent media and its cross regional networks below:
Domestic anti-China NGOs in Hong Kong or near China are also cross regional and international organisations which belonging to NED's worldwide colour revolution networks!
VOICEに関しては、上記の諸事実について以下の記事が参考になる。
Beware of Trinh Hoi and VOICE - A branch of terrorist Viettan
Recently, several anti-governmental individuals have established series of illegal groups and organizations in the name of civil society such as Independent Journalists Association of Vietnam, League of Independent Vietnamese Writers, the Network of Vietnamese Bloggers, Association of Bau Bi Tuong Than coordinated by Le Thi Cong Nhan, Vietnamese Women for Human Rights coordinated by Huynh Thuc Vi, Brotherhood for Democracy coordinated by Nguyen Van Dai, Vietnamese Political & Religiuos Prisoners Friendship Association coordinated by Nguyen Bac Truyen, Former Vietnamese Prisoners of Conscience coordinated by Pham Ba Hai,… All these groups and organizations are born to oppose the Party and State of Vietnam. They try to abuse complicated and sensitive matters to distort the Party and State’s policies.
Rising from these groups, VOICE - an organization led by Trinh Hoi have showed many activities that go against common interests of Vietnam. So, who are Trinh Hoi and VOICE? Let find out with us.
From his introduction, we can see Trinh Hoi has a shiny CV (curriculum vitae) with a dream job, lawyer and has worked as an actor which for that he was awarded the Gold Kite prize of excellent main actor by the Vietnam Cinema Association, and it’s minded that he also was former son-in-law of general Nguyen Cao Ky, Nguyen Cao Ky Duyen’s husband.
Trinh Hoi was born in 1970 in Ho Chi Minh city. At the age of 15, he left Vietnam like other Vietnamese people at this time to earn themselves a better life and came to Australia. In abroad, he has taken part and conducted many activities with anti-Vietnam forces, including Viettan, a known terrorist organization.
In 2008, he cried out he was summoned by Vietnam’s security authorities about his involvement with Hoang Tu Duy - a spokesman of terrorist organization Viettan and was forbidden to enter the country.
Though there are not much information about this man, we still can see his true face by the act of using Nguyen Cao Ky Duyen’s email address, after divorce, to spread articles denoucing the government inside and outside the country and inciting protests and violence. Those articles had been sent to many forums and email addresses that shocked many people about Nguyen Cao Ky Duyen’s aggressive attitude. It took her time and efforts to explain these allegations.
According to anti-Viettan elements abroad, after being forbidden to come back Vietnam, Trinh Hoi has held many activities against the Party and State of Vietnam in the name of Viettan. For years ago, Trinh Hoi was a member of Len duong International Vietnamese Youth in Australia, a franchise of Viettan, which has nurtured some so-called member of Viettan central committee. Even, Trinh Hoi always insists that he is not a member of Viettan, (a common characteristic of members of Viettan to avoid being boycotted by overseas Vietnamese who don’t want to engage with this terrorist organization), but through all his activities we can draw an obvious answer for ourselves.
About VOICE, established in 2007, which Trinh Hoi is a founder and a director for the Philippines’ franchise, which Viettan built up to collect fund from native people and many kinds of Western funds of democracy and human rights. VOICE stands for "Vietnamese Overseas Initiative for Conscience Empowerment", an organization that disguise as a charity one to conduct activities against the State and people of Vietnam. VOICE has launched many training courses to create elements for anti-government campaigns.
Particularly, VOICE branch in Philippines, which led by Trinh Hoi, is claimed working to assist last Vietnamese boatmen with resettlements in Canada, and to support victims in Haiyan storm. But, the truth is he and his organization are trying to collect money for their activities against Vietnam.
It is said that with broad range of alleged charity activities, Trinh Hoi and VOICE have used their names just to raise fund for Viettan. For example, to operations of training elements for civil society movements, each year, VOICE has received a proper amount of money from National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and Human Rights Watch. But with all these budget, VOICE just can find enough individuals for their cources, so they have to use same trainees over and over.
So, while seeing Viettan as a terrorist organization against the State and people of Vietnam, through their complicity, it’s time for us to exclude VOICE from civil society organizations and name them as a terrorist branch, and they must be condemned!
CECC and Imperialist Agents in Hong Kong
On August 17, 2017 (HK local time), it just before the announcement of court of justice of Hong Kong on sentencing the three Umbrella Revolution agents, co-chairman of US Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC), Chris Smith secretly sent emails to one of Umbrella Revolution organizers, Cheuk- yan Lee to threaten judges of the court of justice by manipulating anti-China media. Cheuk-yan Lee is ex-chairman of Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China which also supported by NED. It proves connection between US imperialists and anti-China propagandists in Hong Kong.
The email was indirectly sent by Chris Smith’s assistant, Scott Flipse.
It has been successfully exploded by pro-China media such as Oriental Daily.
I hope you also can help Hong Kong people to criticize US imperialists in Hong Kong.
About Lee Cheuk-yan: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Cheuk-yan
About Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_Alliance_in_Support_of_Pa...
About Chris Smith: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Smith_(New_Jersey_politician)
The email was indirectly sent by Chris Smith’s assistant, Scott Flipse.
It has been successfully exploded by pro-China media such as Oriental Daily.
I hope you also can help Hong Kong people to criticize US imperialists in Hong Kong.
About Lee Cheuk-yan: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Cheuk-yan
About Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_Alliance_in_Support_of_Pa...
About Chris Smith: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Smith_(New_Jersey_politician)
a
URL:Source of the US Congress and Governmental Documents
Oriental Daily: orientaldaily.on.cc
結論：このように、この分析レポートから明確なのは2016年4月のマニラ会合は、本質において全米民主主義基金NEDの主催であり、その支援する台湾ひまわり運動、香港傘革命、ベトナム／フィリピンのVOICE／Viettan、そして我が国日本のNED人工芝運動SEALDsらの会合であり、２０１２年の全米民主主義基金NEDの戦略文書の中の、地域を超えた活動分子のネットワークの実現の一環である。さらにこれは東アジア圏における全米民主主義基金の主要な人工芝運動の勢力の結集と国際規模での組織網の再構成であり、未来のジョイントアクションを準備するものである。また以上の分析から、いかに日本国内及び周辺国の反体制派運動や本物の組織が浸透されていったかが分かる。カラー革命、人工芝運動は反体制派を内から統制する最高度の反革命であり、社会運動へのこれ以上の背理はない。
Conclusion: In its nature, the Manila Gathering was organized by NED. In other words, it's a conference of NED funded Grass Roots Movements such groups as Taiwan Sunflower Movement, Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution, Vietnam/Philippine VOICE/Viet Tan, and Japan's SEALDs, SFT etc.. And this was not only a reconstruction of NED funded Fake Grass Roots Movements in Asia and its network, but also it prepares future joint actions of these groups. On the other hand, you can understand why true dissidents failed in Japan and other Asian countries due to fake grass root movements that infiltrate true revolutionary groups and citizens. Astroturfing is the best mass control tool to manipulate true dissidents from the inside and take off their initiatives. This is the reason why so many social movements ended in neo-liberalist hell.
'Don't let them enter your beloved country or region! Down with stealth imperialism! 請勿讓美帝操作的假草根運動人士進入你所愛的國家地區！其目的在於建立美帝傀儡政權，為美帝跨國企業大開國門寡斷當地資源，實現新自由主義地獄！全亞洲人民的真正的主權獨立萬歲！全世界的工人階級在國際上團結實現更美好的民主主義社會！對美帝爭取獨立！全力支持中國人民及整個亞洲人民對美帝的鬥爭！Do you want Neoliberalist hell in your counrty or region? I don't!' Workers of the world unite!
Citation from Mr.Nakanishi
'Don't let them enter your beloved country or region! Down with stealth imperialism! 請勿讓美帝操作的假草根運動人士進入你所愛的國家地區！其目的在於建立美帝傀儡政權，為美帝跨國企業大開國門寡斷當地資源，實現新自由主義地獄！全亞洲人民的真正的主權獨立萬歲！全世界的工人階級在國際上團結實現更美好的民主主義社會！對美帝爭取獨立！全力支持中國人民及整個亞洲人民對美帝的鬥爭！Do you want Neoliberalist hell in your counrty or region? I don't!' Workers of the world unite!
- Ryota Nakanishi
Citation from Mr.Nakanishi
Special Thanks and Other Recommended Authors and Media
William Blum:http://williamblum.org/
John Pilger: https://vimeo.com/16724719
Peter Dale Scott:http://peterdalescott.net
Barbara Trent:http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0872134/
Blogger m: https://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/x_lucy0_x/42656711.html
Also at http://blog.livedoor.jp/anti_global_baron11x/
Blogger Naomi: https://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/sayonarakkk_0627/34753610.html
Oriental Daily: orientaldaily.on.cc
Russian Today: https://www.rt.com
New Eastern Outlook:https://journal-neo.org
Landdestroyer :http://landdestroyer.blogspot.hk/2014/09/us-openly-approves-hong-kong-chaos-it.html
Wenhuibao:http://pdf.wenweipo.com/2017/07/25/a02-0725.pdf
The American Empire- Project:http://americanempireproject.com
Yoniumuhibi (Japanese Independent Political Blogger):http://critic20.exblog.jp/28719345/#28719345_1
No comments:
Post a Comment